BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3696616)

  • 1. Developing the performance appraisal system.
    Pelle D; Greenhalgh L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Dec; 18(12):37-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 3696616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
    Beck S
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Activity contracting.
    Anderson M
    Superv Nurse; 1979 Nov; 10(11):55-9. PubMed ID: 260323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance appraisal.
    Clark MD
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Oct; 13(10):27-9. PubMed ID: 6924150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing a criterion-based performance appraisal for a department of nursing.
    Megel MA
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1983 Sep; 18(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 6554709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance appraisal--a participative approach.
    Phillips M
    Hosp Adm Can; 1977 Jun; 19(6):68, 70. PubMed ID: 10241968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Managing employee performance.
    Smith J
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Aug; 13(8):14-6. PubMed ID: 6921569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating personnel with automated management systems.
    Brady M
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Jul; 19(7):38-9. PubMed ID: 3386954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are you going stale?
    Wilkinson R
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Jul; 18(7):74-5. PubMed ID: 3648602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Work evaluations: are they effective?
    Loraine K
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Apr; 13(4):44-6. PubMed ID: 6922444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personnel decisions: "wheeling" toward better performance.
    Casebeer L
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Aug; 21(8):42-4. PubMed ID: 2381600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating supplemental professional nurses.
    Metzger NJ
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):54-5, 58-9, 62. PubMed ID: 2294495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
    Stull MK
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making performance appraisal work.
    Noble JE
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Achieving a professional practice model. How primary nursing can help.
    Deiman PA; Noble E; Russell ME
    J Nurs Adm; 1984; 14(7-8):16-21. PubMed ID: 6565035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance evaluations.
    Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):vii-xvi, 1-160. PubMed ID: 2640597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The organizational model "primary nursing": nursing and the management of the nursing station are separated].
    Weidemann KH
    Pflege Z; 1999 Aug; 52(8):575-80. PubMed ID: 10542630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Participative employee evaluation.
    Breeden SA
    J Nurs Adm; 1978 May; 8(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 246911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.