BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36966271)

  • 1. Contrast enhanced mammography in breast cancer surveillance.
    Elder K; Matheson J; Nickson C; Box G; Ellis J; Mou A; Shadbolt C; Park A; Tay J; Rose A; Mann GB
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jun; 199(2):221-230. PubMed ID: 36966271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study.
    Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Fanizza M; Magni V; Menicagli L; Monaco CG; Benedek A; Spinelli D; Di Leo G; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7388-7399. PubMed ID: 35648209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
    Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
    Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
    Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography, Abbreviated Breast MRI, and Standard Breast MRI for Breast Cancer Screening.
    Lawson MB; Partridge SC; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Lam DL; Lee CI; Lowry KP; Scheel JR; Parsian S; Li I; Biswas D; Bryant ML; Lee JM
    Radiology; 2023 Aug; 308(2):e230576. PubMed ID: 37581498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast Biopsy Intensity and Findings Following Breast Cancer Screening in Women With and Without a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Buist DSM; Abraham L; Lee CI; Lee JM; Lehman C; O'Meara ES; Stout NK; Henderson LM; Hill D; Wernli KJ; Haas JS; Tosteson ANA; Kerlikowske K; Onega T;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2018 Apr; 178(4):458-468. PubMed ID: 29435556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.
    Fenton JJ; Xing G; Elmore JG; Bang H; Chen SL; Lindfors KK; Baldwin LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Apr; 158(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 23588746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer.
    Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Conventional Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study.
    Kim G; Phillips J; Cole E; Brook A; Mehta T; Slanetz P; Fishman MDC; Karimova E; Mehta R; Lotfi P; Resteghini N; Raj S; Dialani V
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 31092346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging.
    Taylor DB; Burrows S; Saunders CM; Parizel PM; Ives A
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2023 Feb; 7(1):8. PubMed ID: 36781808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.
    Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.
    Ernster VL; Ballard-Barbash R; Barlow WE; Zheng Y; Weaver DL; Cutter G; Yankaskas BC; Rosenberg R; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Taplin SH; Urban N; Geller BM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Oct; 94(20):1546-54. PubMed ID: 12381707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus MRI in the Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.
    Bernardi D; Vatteroni G; Acquaviva A; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Bolengo I; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Trimboli RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Dec; 219(6):884-894. PubMed ID: 35731101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital breast tomosynthesis compared to diagnostic mammographic projections (including magnification) among women recalled at screening mammography: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).
    Canelo-Aybar C; Carrera L; Beltrán J; Posso M; Rigau D; Lebeau A; Gräwingholt A; Castells X; Langendam M; Pérez E; Giorgi Rossi P; Van Engen R; Parmelli E; Saz-Parkinson Z; Alonso-Coello P
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(7):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 33675147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study.
    Duffy SW; Dibden A; Michalopoulos D; Offman J; Parmar D; Jenkins J; Collins B; Robson T; Scorfield S; Green K; Hall C; Liao XH; Ryan M; Johnson F; Stevens G; Kearins O; Sellars S; Patnick J
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jan; 17(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 26655422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.