148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36966866)
1. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy.
Ulutas HG; Ozkaya G; Amuk Hamidi N
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Jun; 42():103527. PubMed ID: 36966866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.
Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M
Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with different non-contact devices in healthy children.
Yalcın SO; Kaplan AT
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Dec; 40():103045. PubMed ID: 35908681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness.
Calvo-Sanz JA; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Sánchez-Tena MA
J Optom; 2018; 11(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 28254359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
Scotto R; Bagnis A; Papadia M; Cutolo CA; Risso D; Traverso CE
J Glaucoma; 2017 Oct; 26(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 28834824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of central corneal thickness measured using noncontact methods and ultrasonic pachymetry.
Toptan M; Simsek A
Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Oct; 24(10):1506-1510. PubMed ID: 34657017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.
Soulantzou K; Plakitsi A; Chalkiadaki E; Anastasopoulou M; Karmiris E
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):363-370. PubMed ID: 35864284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Obtained by RTVue OCT, Lenstar, Sirius Topography, and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Healthy Subjects.
Şimşek A; Bilak Ş; Güler M; Çapkin M; Bilgin B; Reyhan AH
Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 25412328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices.
Doğan M; Ertan E
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):126-130. PubMed ID: 30557910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.
Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anterior ocular biometry using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography.
Fukuda S; Kawana K; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):882-9. PubMed ID: 19410946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography.
Li Y; Shekhar R; Huang D
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):792-9.e2. PubMed ID: 16650675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy Eyes.
Ucak T; Icel E; Tasli NG; Karakurt Y; Yilmaz H; Ugurlu A; Demir M
Beyoglu Eye J; 2021; 6(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 35005485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.
Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR
Wolfel AE; Pederson SL; Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS
Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
Şimşek C; Kaya C; Karalezli A
Turk J Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 52(5):318-323. PubMed ID: 36317802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Glaucoma Patients and Elderly and Young Controls.
Pillunat KR; Waibel S; Spoerl E; Herber R; Pillunat LE
J Glaucoma; 2019 Jun; 28(6):540-545. PubMed ID: 30855412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness measurement with non-contact methods: a comparative study.
Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):959-966. PubMed ID: 28434071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
