These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36966912)

  • 1. Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of Spinal Pedicle Screws Placement Precision Is in Full Agreement with Postoperative Computed Tomography Assessment.
    Ohashi H; Kawamura D; Hatano K; Ohashi S; Tochigi S; Isoshima A; Nagashima H; Otani K; Karagiozov K; Tani S; Murayama Y
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; 175():e254-e263. PubMed ID: 36966912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a new intraoperative cone beam CT imaging technique (Artis zeego II) compared to postoperative CT scan for assessment of pedicle screws placement and breaches detection.
    Cordemans V; Kaminski L; Banse X; Francq BG; Cartiaux O
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2906-2916. PubMed ID: 28528479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography is as reliable as conventional computed tomography for identification of pedicle screw breach in thoracolumbar spine surgery.
    Burström G; Cewe P; Charalampidis A; Nachabe R; Söderman M; Gerdhem P; Elmi-Terander A; Edström E
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2349-2356. PubMed ID: 33006659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation doses and accuracy of navigated pedicle screw placement in cervical and thoracic spine surgery: a comparison of sliding gantry CT and mobile cone-beam CT in a homogeneous cohort.
    Baumgart L; Ille S; Kirschke JS; Meyer B; Krieg SM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Sep; 39(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 37310023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the postoperative pedicle screw position after dorsal instrumentation with or without intraoperative cone beam CT imaging worse in patients with obesity than in normal-weight patients?
    Zimmermann F; Kohl K; Mandelka E; Grützner PA; Franke J; Vetter SY
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Nov; 17(1):474. PubMed ID: 36329438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of intraoperative CT- and cone beam CT-based spinal navigation for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability.
    Haemmerli J; Ferdowssian K; Wessels L; Mertens R; Hecht N; Woitzik J; Schneider UC; Bayerl SH; Vajkoczy P; Czabanka M
    Spine J; 2023 Dec; 23(12):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 37619869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Navigated percutaneous versus open pedicle screw implantation using intraoperative CT and robotic cone-beam CT imaging.
    Tkatschenko D; Kendlbacher P; Czabanka M; Bohner G; Vajkoczy P; Hecht N
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Apr; 29(4):803-812. PubMed ID: 31820094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy in terms of breach and reposition using a new intraoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging technique and evaluation of the factors associated with these parameters of accuracy: a series of 695 screws.
    Cordemans V; Kaminski L; Banse X; Francq BG; Detrembleur C; Cartiaux O
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2917-2926. PubMed ID: 28631190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generating patient-matched 3D-printed pedicle screw and laminectomy drill guides from Cone Beam CT images: Studies in ovine and porcine cadavers.
    Kanawati A; Constantinidis A; Williams Z; O'Brien R; Reynolds T
    Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4642-4652. PubMed ID: 35445429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and Accuracy of Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement and the Role of Intraoperative O-Arm: A Single-Institution Experience.
    Alomari S; Lubelski D; Lehner K; Tang A; Wolinsky JP; Theodore N; Sciubba DM; Larry Lo SF; Belzberg A; Weingart J; Witham T; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Feb; 48(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 36190990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the Airo mobile intraoperative CT system versus the O-arm for transpedicular screw fixation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study of 263 patients.
    Scarone P; Vincenzo G; Distefano D; Del Grande F; Cianfoni A; Presilla S; Reinert M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Oct; 29(4):397-406. PubMed ID: 29979141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First Clinical Experience with a Novel 3D C-Arm-Based System for Navigated Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement.
    Mandelka E; Gierse J; Gruetzner PA; Franke J; Vetter SY
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Aug; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 36013578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and lumbar spine instrumentation using navigation based on an intraoperative cone beam CT imaging system: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Pireau N; Cordemans V; Banse X; Irda N; Lichtherte S; Kaminski L
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2818-2827. PubMed ID: 28735464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intraoperative cone-beam CT versus preoperative fan-beam CT for navigated spine surgery: a prospective randomized study.
    Tu TH; Kuo YH; Chang CC; Kuo CH; Chang HK; Fay LY; Yeh MY; Ko CC; Huang WC; Wu JC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Feb; 40(2):240-247. PubMed ID: 38000063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT-to-fluoroscopy registration versus scan-and-plan registration for robot-assisted insertion of lumbar pedicle screws.
    Khan A; Soliman MAR; Lee NJ; Waqas M; Lombardi JM; Boddapati V; Levy LC; Mao JZ; Park PJ; Mathew J; Lehman RA; Mullin JP; Pollina J
    Neurosurg Focus; 2022 Jan; 52(1):E8. PubMed ID: 34973678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel technique of cervical pedicle screw placement with a pilot screw under the guidance of intraoperative 3D imaging from C-arm cone-beam CT without navigation for safe and accurate insertion.
    Takahata M; Yamada K; Akira I; Endo T; Sudo H; Yokoyama H; Iwasaki N
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2754-2762. PubMed ID: 30039255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spinal intraoperative three-dimensional navigation: correlation between clinical and absolute engineering accuracy.
    Guha D; Jakubovic R; Gupta S; Alotaibi NM; Cadotte D; da Costa LB; George R; Heyn C; Howard P; Kapadia A; Klostranec JM; Phan N; Tan G; Mainprize TG; Yee A; Yang VX
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):489-498. PubMed ID: 27777052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison.
    Solomiichuk V; Fleischhammer J; Molliqaj G; Warda J; Alaid A; von Eckardstein K; Schaller K; Tessitore E; Rohde V; Schatlo B
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E13. PubMed ID: 28463620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electromyography stimulation compared with intraoperative O-arm imaging for evaluating pedicle screw breaches in lumbar spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1006 screws in 164 patients.
    Ravindra VM; Kalra RR; Dailey AT
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 29960110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Workflow and performance of intraoperative CT, cone-beam CT, and robotic cone-beam CT for spinal navigation in 503 consecutive patients.
    Kendlbacher P; Tkatschenko D; Czabanka M; Bayerl S; Bohner G; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P; Hecht N
    Neurosurg Focus; 2022 Jan; 52(1):E7. PubMed ID: 34973677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.