178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36967236)
21. A Note on the
Dimitrov DM; Luo Y
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):545-557. PubMed ID: 31105322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
Brown A
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.
Teresi JA; Wang C; Kleinman M; Jones RN; Weiss DJ
Psychometrika; 2021 Sep; 86(3):674-711. PubMed ID: 34251615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model.
Chen Y; Li X; Liu J; Ying Z
Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):538-562. PubMed ID: 29532405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.
Teresi JA; Kleinman M; Ocepek-Welikson K
Stat Med; 2000 Jun 15-30; 19(11-12):1651-83. PubMed ID: 10844726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Linking Methods for Multidimensional Forced Choice Tests Using the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model.
Tu N; Kumar LS; Joo S; Stark S
Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 May; 48(3):104-124. PubMed ID: 38585303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Estimating person parameters via item response model and simple sum score in small samples with few polytomous items: A simulation study.
Schwall P; Meesters C; Hardt J
Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):4040-4050. PubMed ID: 31236972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Item-Weighted Likelihood Method for Measuring Growth in Longitudinal Study With Tests Composed of Both Dichotomous and Polytomous Items.
Xue X; Lu J; Zhang J
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():580015. PubMed ID: 34385940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
Ferrando PJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing Cognitive Abilities Using the WAIS-IV: An Item Response Theory Approach.
Abdelhamid GSM; Bassiouni MGA; Gómez-Benito J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34202249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.
Öztürk NK; Karabatsos G
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 29881088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Parameter Recovery in Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models Under Complexity and Nonnormality.
Svetina D; Valdivia A; Underhill S; Dai S; Wang X
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Oct; 41(7):530-544. PubMed ID: 29881104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Taking the Test Taker's Perspective: Response Process and Test Motivation in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Versus Rating Scale Instruments.
Sass R; Frick S; Reips UD; Wetzel E
Assessment; 2020 Apr; 27(3):572-584. PubMed ID: 29560735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?
Schulte N; Holling H; Bürkner PC
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):262-289. PubMed ID: 37929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An item analysis of the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression.
DeSimone JA; James LR
J Appl Psychol; 2015 Nov; 100(6):1872-86. PubMed ID: 26011720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
Liu CW; Wang WC
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Polytomous multilevel testlet models for testlet-based assessments with complex sampling designs.
Jiao H; Zhang Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Feb; 68(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 24571376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
