BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36967604)

  • 1. The Effects of Acoustic and Semantic Enhancements on Perception of Native and Non-Native Speech.
    Kato M; Baese-Berk MM
    Lang Speech; 2024 Mar; 67(1):40-71. PubMed ID: 36967604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of acoustic and semantic cues on listening effort during native and non-native speech perception.
    Borghini G; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3783. PubMed ID: 32611155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
    Shi LF
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners.
    Bradlow AR; Alexander JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2339-49. PubMed ID: 17471746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual consequences of native and non-native clear speech.
    Kato M; Baese-Berk MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1246. PubMed ID: 35232086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sentence Context Facilitation for Children's and Adults' Recognition of Native- and Nonnative-Accented Speech.
    Bent T; Holt RF; Miller K; Libersky E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):423-433. PubMed ID: 30950691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2772. PubMed ID: 27250170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts.
    Hayes-Harb R; Smith BL; Bent T; Bradlow AR
    J Phon; 2008; 36(4):664-679. PubMed ID: 19606271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness.
    Smiljanić R; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4020-31. PubMed ID: 22225056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-linguistic Influences on Sentence Accent Detection in Background Noise.
    Scharenborg O; Kakouros S; Post B; Meunier F
    Lang Speech; 2020 Mar; 63(1):3-30. PubMed ID: 30606083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English.
    Xie X; Fowler CA
    J Phon; 2013 Sep; 41(5):. PubMed ID: 24293741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3004-13. PubMed ID: 12509022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-native talkers and listeners and the perceptual benefits of clear speech.
    Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):137. PubMed ID: 36732255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
    Meemann K; Smiljanić R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.