These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36967604)

  • 21. Effects of noise and talker intelligibility on judgments of accentedness.
    Gittleman S; Van Engen KJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3138. PubMed ID: 29857746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Bieber RE; Jara Ureta DA; Freund MS; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4S):1131-1143. PubMed ID: 31026190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1906-16. PubMed ID: 12002873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Pickett EJ; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1132-48. PubMed ID: 27036250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nonnative audiovisual speech perception in noise: dissociable effects of the speaker and listener.
    Xie Z; Yi HG; Chandrasekaran B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114439. PubMed ID: 25474650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of phonetically-cued talker variation on semantic encoding.
    Sumner M; Kataoka R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):EL485. PubMed ID: 25669293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Children's Use of Semantic Context in Perception of Foreign-Accented Speech.
    Holt RF; Bent T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):223-230. PubMed ID: 28056139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of Task Demands on Neural Correlates of Acoustic and Semantic Processing in Challenging Listening Conditions.
    Devaraju DS; Kemp A; Eddins DA; Shrivastav R; Chandrasekaran B; Hampton Wray A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Sep; 64(9):3697-3706. PubMed ID: 34403278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of semantic context on the perception of Spanish-accented American English.
    Behrman A; Akhund A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1567-78. PubMed ID: 23882007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of speech cues in French-speaking children with dysarthria.
    Levy ES; Moya-Galé G; Chang YM; Campanelli L; MacLeod AAN; Escorial S; Maillart C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2020 May; 55(3):401-416. PubMed ID: 32077196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.
    Bent T; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 14514213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-language perception of Cantonese vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers.
    So CK; Attina V
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Oct; 43(5):611-30. PubMed ID: 24057944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure.
    Strori D; Bradlow AR; Souza PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jun; 147(6):3765. PubMed ID: 32611135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech.
    Sidaras SK; Alexander JE; Nygaard LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3306-16. PubMed ID: 19425672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers.
    Chrabaszcz A; Winn M; Lin CY; Idsardi WJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1468-79. PubMed ID: 24686836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.