These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3696935)

  • 1. Interhemispheric integration of compound nouns: effects of stimulus arrangement and mode of presentation.
    Berger JM; Perret E; Zimmermann A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Oct; 65(2):663-71. PubMed ID: 3696935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of interstimulus and stimulus-hemisphere compatibility in the process of interhemispheric integration.
    Berger JM; Perret E; Zimmermann A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Oct; 67(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 3217198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interhemispheric cooperation and activation in integration of verbal information.
    Berger JM
    Behav Brain Res; 1988 Aug; 29(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 3166698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of tachistoscopically presented consonant-vowel syllables.
    Chermak GD; Borneman HJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 6634323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric preference of paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenics.
    Magaro PA; Chamrad DL
    Biol Psychiatry; 1983 Nov; 18(11):1269-85. PubMed ID: 6652163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphological complexity and cerebral lateralization.
    Goodall G
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 6462430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral-foveal scanning and the identification of heteropalindromes in the visual half-fields.
    Fundin R; Lembessis E; Charles WG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 3503257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Visual field differences in a letter classification task in unilateral and bilateral presentation conditions].
    Ohtani Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1984 Apr; 55(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 6471627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interhemispheric integration of information in a surface estimation task.
    Berger JM; Perret E
    Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 3785663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brief Communication: visual-field superiority as a function of stimulus type and content: further evidence.
    Basu A; Mandal MK
    Int J Neurosci; 2004 Jul; 114(7):833-9. PubMed ID: 15204048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of visual familiarity for words on interhemispheric cooperation for lexical processing.
    Yoshizaki K
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):409-14. PubMed ID: 11689300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The bilateral advantage for famous faces: interhemispheric communication or competition?
    Baird LM; Burton AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 18281066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-awareness and the subconscious effect of personal pronouns on word encoding: a magnetoencephalography (MEG) study.
    Walla P; Greiner K; Duregger C; Deecke L; Thurner S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):796-809. PubMed ID: 17005211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of type of center fixation stimulus on visual-field preferences: a preliminary study.
    Moore WH; Snow KA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 6634317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefits of interhemispheric integration on the Japanese Kana script-matching tasks.
    Yoshizaki K; Tsuji Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Feb; 90(1):153-65. PubMed ID: 10769894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Components of asymmetrical visual encoding of geometrically transformed scripts.
    Cohen AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):755-65. PubMed ID: 876783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemisphericity and top-down processing of language.
    Faust M; Kravetz S; Babkoff H
    Brain Lang; 1993 Jan; 44(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 8467373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age of reading acquisition does not affect visual hemifield asymmetries for naming imageable nouns.
    Young AW; Bion PJ; Ellis AW
    Cortex; 1982 Oct; 18(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 7151456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral processing of numbers: parallel processing versus functional unity.
    Berger JM; Landolt M
    Cortex; 1990 Dec; 26(4):555-66. PubMed ID: 2081393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.