These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3696943)

  • 1. A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming.
    Izura C; Playfoot D
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):862-89. PubMed ID: 22180103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The acronym superiority effect.
    Laszlo S; Federmeier KD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1158-63. PubMed ID: 18229490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition in early reading: a review of the direct and indirect access hypotheses.
    Barron RW
    Cognition; 1986 Nov; 24(1-2):93-119. PubMed ID: 3539489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A word superiority effect with nonorthographic acronyms: testing for unitized visual codes.
    Noice H; Hock HS
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Nov; 42(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 3696943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enduring influence of the purpose of experiences: encoding-retrieval interactions in word and pseudoword perception.
    Whittlesea BW; Cantwell AL
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Nov; 15(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 3695940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.
    Inhoff AW; Rayner K
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Dec; 40(6):431-9. PubMed ID: 3808910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive processes in reading text.
    Healy AF
    Cognition; 1981; 10(1-3):119-26. PubMed ID: 7198525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are letter codes always activated?
    Greenberg SN
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 3226880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Remembering operations.
    Kolers PA
    Mem Cognit; 1973 Sep; 1(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 24214568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What does the visual system know about words.
    Carr TH; Pollatsek A; Posner MI
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Feb; 29(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 7255100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.
    Reicher GM
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Aug; 81(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 5811803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.
    McClelland JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Feb; 2(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 1262797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiarity affects visual processing of words.
    Pollatsek A; Well AD; Schindler RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Nov; 1(4):328-38. PubMed ID: 1185120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.