These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36970519)

  • 1. Cocktail-party listening and cognitive abilities show strong pleiotropy.
    Mathias SR; Knowles EEM; Mollon J; Rodrigue AL; Woolsey MK; Hernandez AM; Garret AS; Fox PT; Olvera RL; Peralta JM; Kumar S; Göring HHH; Duggirala R; Curran JE; Blangero J; Glahn DC
    Front Neurol; 2023; 14():1071766. PubMed ID: 36970519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Genetic contribution to solving the cocktail-party problem.
    Mathias SR; Knowles EEM; Mollon J; Rodrigue AL; Woolsey MK; Hernandez AM; Garrett AS; Fox PT; Olvera RL; Peralta JM; Kumar S; Göring HHH; Duggirala R; Curran JE; Blangero J; Glahn DC
    iScience; 2022 Sep; 25(9):104997. PubMed ID: 36111257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static and dynamic cocktail party listening in younger and older adults.
    Meister H; Wenzel F; Gehlen AK; Kessler J; Walger M
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108020. PubMed ID: 32698114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the Link Between Cognitive Abilities and Speech Recognition in the Elderly Under Different Listening Conditions.
    Nuesse T; Steenken R; Neher T; Holube I
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():678. PubMed ID: 29867654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in speech intelligibility at a cocktail party: A modeling perspective.
    Lavandier M; Mason CR; Baltzell LS; Best V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):1076. PubMed ID: 34470293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Costs of dynamic cocktail party listening: Investigating the effects of cognitive abilities and hearing impairment.
    Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 Jul; 1(7):075201. PubMed ID: 36154643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of subcortical auditory processing and cognitive measures on cocktail party listening in younger and older adults.
    Jain C; Dwarakanath VM; G A
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 30646763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Executive Function, Visual Attention and the Cocktail Party Problem in Musicians and Non-Musicians.
    Clayton KK; Swaminathan J; Yazdanbakhsh A; Zuk J; Patel AD; Kidd G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0157638. PubMed ID: 27384330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a Test Battery for Evaluating Speech Perception in Complex Listening Environments: Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Phatak SA; Sheffield BM; Brungart DS; Grant KW
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 29570117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linguistic processing of task-irrelevant speech at a cocktail party.
    Har-Shai Yahav P; Zion Golumbic E
    Elife; 2021 May; 10():. PubMed ID: 33942722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revealing Perceptional and Cognitive Mechanisms in Static and Dynamic Cocktail Party Listening by Means of Error Analyses.
    Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221111676. PubMed ID: 35849353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal and Directional Cue Effects on the Cocktail Party Problem for Patients With Listening Difficulties Without Clinical Hearing Loss.
    Kawase T; Teraoka R; Obuchi C; Sakamoto S
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1740-1751. PubMed ID: 35671083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners.
    Schoof T; Rosen S
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2014; 6():307. PubMed ID: 25429266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech in Noise Perception as a Marker of Cognitive Impairment in HIV Infection.
    Zhan Y; Fellows AM; Qi T; Clavier OH; Soli SD; Shi X; Gui J; Shi Y; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):548-554. PubMed ID: 29112532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.