These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36971815)

  • 1. User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review.
    Hamza H; Baez VM; Al-Ansari A; Becker AT; Navkar NV
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4193-4223. PubMed ID: 36971815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary design and evaluation of a generic surgical scope adapter.
    Khorasani M; Abdurahiman N; Padhan J; Zhao H; Al-Ansari A; Becker AT; Navkar N
    Int J Med Robot; 2023 Apr; 19(2):e2475. PubMed ID: 36288569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of user-interfaces for controlling movements of virtual minimally invasive surgical instruments.
    Shabir D; Anbatawi M; Padhan J; Balakrishnan S; Al-Ansari A; Abinahed J; Tsiamyrtzis P; Yaacoub E; Mohammed A; Deng Z; Navkar NV
    Int J Med Robot; 2022 Oct; 18(5):e2414. PubMed ID: 35486635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Touchless interaction with software in interventional radiology and surgery: a systematic literature review.
    Mewes A; Hensen B; Wacker F; Hansen C
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Feb; 12(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 27647327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intuitive user interfaces increase efficiency in endoscope tip control.
    Rozeboom E; Ruiter J; Franken M; Broeders I
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2600-5. PubMed ID: 24671354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms.
    Boal M; Di Girasole CG; Tesfai F; Morrison TEM; Higgs S; Ahmad J; Arezzo A; Francis N
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):554-585. PubMed ID: 38123746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical robotics. Evaluation of the Computer Motion AESOP 3000 robotic endoscope holder.
    Health Devices; 2002 Jul; 31(7):256-68. PubMed ID: 12187573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A technical review of flexible endoscopic multitasking platforms.
    Yeung BP; Gourlay T
    Int J Surg; 2012; 10(7):345-54. PubMed ID: 22641123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multimodal user interface for touchless control of robotic ultrasound.
    Schreiter J; Mielke T; Schott D; Thormann M; Omari J; Pech M; Hansen C
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(8):1429-1436. PubMed ID: 36565368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A robotic flexible endoscope with shared autonomy: a study of mockup cholecystectomy.
    Song C; Ma X; Xia X; Chiu PWY; Chong CCN; Li Z
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2730-2741. PubMed ID: 31722046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A generic scope actuation system for flexible endoscopes.
    Basha S; Khorasani M; Abdurahiman N; Padhan J; Baez V; Al-Ansari A; Tsiamyrtzis P; Becker AT; Navkar NV
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Feb; 38(2):1096-1105. PubMed ID: 38066193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A highly articulated robotic surgical system for minimally invasive surgery.
    Ota T; Degani A; Schwartzman D; Zubiate B; McGarvey J; Choset H; Zenati MA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Apr; 87(4):1253-6. PubMed ID: 19324161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic Transnasal Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: Systematic Review of the Literature and Report of a Novel Prototype for a Hybrid System (Brescia Endoscope Assistant Robotic Holder).
    Bolzoni Villaret A; Doglietto F; Carobbio A; Schreiber A; Panni C; Piantoni E; Guida G; Fontanella MM; Nicolai P; Cassinis R
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():875-883. PubMed ID: 28645603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of contactless human-machine interface for robotic surgical training.
    Despinoy F; Zemiti N; Forestier G; Sánchez A; Jannin P; Poignet P
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jan; 13(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 28914409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technological advances in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    Tan GY; Goel RK; Kaouk JH; Tewari AK
    Urol Clin North Am; 2009 May; 36(2):237-49, ix. PubMed ID: 19406324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic and imaging in urological surgery.
    Teber D; Baumhauer M; Guven EO; Rassweiler J
    Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 19057226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward a novel soft robotic system for minimally invasive interventions.
    Barnes N; Young O; Colton A; Liu X; Janowski M; Gandhi D; Sochol R; Brown J; Krieger A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Sep; 18(9):1547-1557. PubMed ID: 37486544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.
    Peters BS; Armijo PR; Krause C; Choudhury SA; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1636-1655. PubMed ID: 29442240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery?
    Simorov A; Otte RS; Kopietz CM; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Aug; 26(8):2117-25. PubMed ID: 22350236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.