203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36972299)
1. The effect of common dental fixtures on treatment planning and delivery for head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.
Hu YH; Seum WCTH; Hunzeker A; Muller O; Foote RL; Mundy DW
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13973. PubMed ID: 36972299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical characterization of therapeutic proton delivery through common dental materials.
Hu YH; Wan Chan Tseung HS; Mundy DW
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2904-2913. PubMed ID: 35276753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A GPU-accelerated and Monte Carlo-based intensity modulated proton therapy optimization system.
Ma J; Beltran C; Seum Wan Chan Tseung H; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121707. PubMed ID: 25471954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fan-beam intensity modulated proton therapy.
Hill P; Westerly D; Mackie T
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111704. PubMed ID: 24320412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of dose perturbations for metal stent in photon and proton radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Lee B; Cho S; Park HC; Kang SW; Kim JS; Chung JB
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 35842636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of single-energy proton pencil beam scanning Bragg peak for intensity-modulated proton therapy FLASH treatment planning in liver-hypofractionated radiation therapy.
Wei S; Lin H; Shi C; Xiong W; Chen CC; Huang S; Press RH; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Choi JI; Simone CB; Kang M
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6560-6574. PubMed ID: 35929404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinically Applicable Monte Carlo-based Biological Dose Optimization for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers With Spot-Scanning Proton Therapy.
Wan Chan Tseung HS; Ma J; Kreofsky CR; Ma DJ; Beltran C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Aug; 95(5):1535-1543. PubMed ID: 27325476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric impact of random spot positioning errors in intensity modulated proton therapy plans of small and large volume tumors.
Arjunan M; Krishnan G; Sharma DS; M P N; Patro KC; Thiyagarajan R; Srinivas C; Jalali R
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20201031. PubMed ID: 33529057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. TriB-RT: Simultaneous optimization of photon, electron and proton beams.
Kueng R; Mueller S; Loebner HA; Frei D; Volken W; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Fix MK; Manser P
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045006. PubMed ID: 32413883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy.
Jeon C; Lee J; Shin J; Cheon W; Ahn S; Jo K; Han Y
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7139-7153. PubMed ID: 37756652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shortening delivery times for intensity-modulated proton therapy by reducing the number of proton spots: an experimental verification.
van de Water S; Belosi MF; Albertini F; Winterhalter C; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095008. PubMed ID: 32155594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two methods for minimizing the effect of delayed charge on the dose delivered with a synchrotron based discrete spot scanning proton beam.
Whitaker TJ; Beltran C; Tryggestad E; Bues M; Kruse JJ; Remmes NB; Tasson A; Herman MG
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081703. PubMed ID: 25086513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers mitigate the uncertainties in proton relative biological effectiveness associated with anterior-oblique beams.
Underwood TS; Voog JC; Moteabbed M; Tang S; Soffen E; Cahlon O; Lu HM; Zietman AL; Efstathiou JA; Paganetti H
Acta Oncol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):575-581. PubMed ID: 28075206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical Note: Clinical modeling and validation of breast tissue expander metallic ports in a commercial treatment planning system for proton therapy.
Kang Y; Shen J; Bues M; Hu Y; Liu W; Ding X
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7512-7525. PubMed ID: 34519357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
