163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36973367)
1. Optimizing detection of clinically significant prostate cancer through nomograms incorporating mri, clinical features, and advanced serum biomarkers in biopsy naïve men.
Siddiqui MR; Li EV; Kumar SKSR; Busza A; Lin JS; Mahenthiran AK; Aguiar JA; Shah PV; Ansbro B; Rich JM; Moataz SAS; Keeter MK; Mai Q; Mi X; Tosoian JJ; Schaeffer EM; Patel HD; Ross AE
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Sep; 26(3):588-595. PubMed ID: 36973367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nomogram predicting prostate cancer in patients with negative prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance.
Chen M; Wang R; Zhang T; Zhang X; Wan Y; Fu X
Future Oncol; 2022 Apr; 18(12):1473-1483. PubMed ID: 35105154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MultiParametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeat Prostate Biopsy.
Huang C; Song G; Wang H; Ji G; Li J; Chen Y; Fan Y; Fang D; Xiong G; Xin Z; Zhou L
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():6368309. PubMed ID: 30276213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of prostate health index and PSA density in a diverse biopsy-naïve cohort with mpMRI for detecting significant prostate cancer.
Carbunaru S; Stinson J; Babajide R; Hollowell CMP; Yang X; Sekosan M; Ferrer K; Kajdacsy-Balla A; Abelleira J; Ruden M; King-Lee P; Dalton DP; Casalino DD; Kittles RA; Gann PH; Schaeffer EM; Murphy AB
BJUI Compass; 2021 Nov; 2(6):370-376. PubMed ID: 35474697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.
Zhou Z; Liang Z; Zuo Y; Zhou Y; Yan W; Wu X; Ji Z; Li H; Hu M; Ma L
Prostate; 2022 Apr; 82(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 35098557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The predictive value of the prostate health index vs. multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in prostate biopsy.
Stejskal J; Adamcová V; Záleský M; Novák V; Čapoun O; Fiala V; Dolejšová O; Sedláčková H; Veselý Š; Zachoval R
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1889-1895. PubMed ID: 32761380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Sobotka S; Ratnani P; Young J; Lantz A; Parekh S; Falagario UG; Li L; Lewis S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2021 Aug; 4(4):e1357. PubMed ID: 33661541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The stanford prostate cancer calculator: Development and external validation of online nomograms incorporating PIRADS scores to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
Wang NN; Zhou SR; Chen L; Tibshirani R; Fan RE; Ghanouni P; Thong AE; To'o KJ; Ghabili K; Nix JW; Gordetsky JB; Sprenkle P; Rais-Bahrami S; Sonn GA
Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):831.e19-831.e27. PubMed ID: 34247909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Novel Prediction Tool Based on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine the Biopsy Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with PSA Levels Less than 50 ng/ml.
He BM; Shi ZK; Li HS; Lin HZ; Yang QS; Lu JP; Sun YH; Wang HF
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):1284-1295. PubMed ID: 31848822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Prostate Health Index and multi-parametric MRI improve diagnostic accuracy of detecting prostate cancer in Asian populations.
Ye C; Ho JN; Kim DH; Song SH; Kim H; Lee H; Jeong SJ; Hong SK; Byun SS; Ahn H; Hwang SI; Lee HJ; Lee S
Investig Clin Urol; 2022 Nov; 63(6):631-638. PubMed ID: 36347552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prostate biopsy risk calculator based on MRI: development and comparison of the Prospective Loyola University multiparametric MRI (PLUM) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gerena M; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
BJU Int; 2023 Feb; 131(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 35733400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Among Men Undergoing Combined MRI-targeted and Systematic Biopsy Using Novel Pre-biopsy Nomograms That Incorporate MRI Findings.
Bjurlin MA; Rosenkrantz AB; Sarkar S; Lepor H; Huang WC; Huang R; Venkataraman R; Taneja SS
Urology; 2018 Feb; 112():112-120. PubMed ID: 29155186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
Panebianco V; Barchetti G; Simone G; Del Monte M; Ciardi A; Grompone MD; Campa R; Indino EL; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Leonardo C; Gallucci M; Catalano C
Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 29566957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Based on PI-RADS v2.1 combining PHI and ADC values to guide prostate biopsy in patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL.
Huang H; Liu Z; Ma Y; Shao Y; Yang Z; Duan D; Zhao Y; Wen S; Tian J; Liu Y; Wang Z; Yue D; Wang Y
Prostate; 2024 Mar; 84(4):376-388. PubMed ID: 38116741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward an MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of transperineal prostate biopsy outcome: A physician and patient decision tool.
Lee SM; Liyanage SH; Wulaningsih W; Wolfe K; Carr T; Younis C; Van Hemelrijck M; Popert R; Acher P
Urol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):664.e11-664.e18. PubMed ID: 28801025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and external validation of a novel nomogram to predict prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA <10 ng/ml and PI-RADS v2.1 = 3 lesions.
Hu C; Sun J; Xu Z; Zhang Z; Zhou Q; Xu J; Chen H; Wang C; Ouyang J
Cancer Med; 2023 Feb; 12(3):2560-2571. PubMed ID: 35920264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
