167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36973367)
21. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI-based risk score for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10 ng/mL.
Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Dwivedi AK; Bora GS; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1227-1236. PubMed ID: 28872226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical study of multifactorial diagnosis in prostate biopsy.
Li J; Wang K; Li S; Wu P; Wang X; He Y; Tang W
Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1494-1503. PubMed ID: 37545333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing the accuracy of multiparametric MRI to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men across racial/ethnic groups.
Meza J; Babajide R; Saoud R; Sweis J; Abelleira J; Helenowski I; Jovanovic B; Eggener S; Miller FH; Horowitz JM; Casalino DD; Murphy AB
BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):107. PubMed ID: 35850677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How to implement magnetic resonance imaging before prostate biopsy in clinical practice: nomograms for saving biopsies.
Borque-Fernando Á; Esteban LM; Celma A; Roche S; Planas J; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Trilla E; Morote J
World J Urol; 2020 Jun; 38(6):1481-1491. PubMed ID: 31506748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Added value of systematic biopsy in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing biparametric MRI-targeted biopsy: multi-institutional external validation study.
Falagario U; Jambor I; Taimen P; Syvänen KT; Kähkönen E; Merisaari H; Montoya Perez I; Knaapila J; Steiner A; Verho J; Tewari A; Aronen HJ; Carrieri G; Boström PJ; Ettala O
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 32778912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based risk model to determine the risk of significant prostate cancer prior to biopsy.
van Leeuwen PJ; Hayen A; Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Böhm M; Abuodha M; Haynes AM; Ting F; Barentsz J; Roobol M; Vass J; Rasiah K; Delprado W; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2017 Dec; 120(6):774-781. PubMed ID: 28207981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Use of the Prostate Health Index for detection of prostate cancer: results from a large academic practice.
Tosoian JJ; Druskin SC; Andreas D; Mullane P; Chappidi M; Joo S; Ghabili K; Agostino J; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Schaeffer EM; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2017 Jun; 20(2):228-233. PubMed ID: 28117387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multiparametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing repeat biopsy: a prospective comparison with clinical findings and histopathology.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 28679325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Wagaskar VG; Levy M; Ratnani P; Moody K; Garcia M; Pedraza AM; Parekh S; Pandav K; Shukla B; Prasad S; Sobotka S; Haines K; Punnen S; Wiklund P; Tewari A
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Jun; 28():9-16. PubMed ID: 34337520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Utility of PSA density in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions across a large multi-institutional collaborative.
Drevik J; Dalimov Z; Uzzo R; Danella J; Guzzo T; Belkoff L; Raman J; Tomaszewski J; Trabulsi E; Reese A; Singer EA; Syed K; Jacobs B; Correa A; Smaldone M; Ginzburg S
Urol Oncol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):490.e1-490.e6. PubMed ID: 36163229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The potential of a nomogram combined PI-RADS v2.1 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce unnecessary biopsies in prostate cancer diagnostics.
Liu Y; Wang S; Xiang LH; Xu G; Dong L; Sun Y; Ye B; Zhang Y; Xu H
Br J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 95(1138):20220209. PubMed ID: 35877385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.
Stonier T; Simson N; Shah T; Lobo N; Amer T; Lee SM; Bass E; Chau E; Grey A; McCartan N; Acher P; Ahmad I; Arumainayagam N; Brown D; Chapman A; Elf D; Hartington T; Ibrahim I; Leung H; Liyanage S; Lovegrove C; Malthouse T; Mateen B; Mistry K; Morrison I; Nalagatla S; Persad R; Pope A; Sokhi H; Syed H; Tadtayev S; Tharmaratnam M; Qteishat A; Miah S; Emberton M; Moore C; Walton T; Eddy B; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 33046412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Incorporation of trans-rectal color doppler flow imaging and risk-stratification nomogram reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in suspected prostate cancer patients: a bi-centered retrospective validation study.
Guo Y; Su K; Lu M; Liu X
BMC Urol; 2023 May; 23(1):81. PubMed ID: 37138271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China.
Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Nie L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Jin K; Li JK; Xiong XY; Yang L; Wei Q
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(6):615-619. PubMed ID: 35532555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical utility and cost modelling of the phi test to triage referrals into image-based diagnostic services for suspected prostate cancer: the PRIM (Phi to RefIne Mri) study.
Kim L; Boxall N; George A; Burling K; Acher P; Aning J; McCracken S; Page T; Gnanapragasam VJ
BMC Med; 2020 Apr; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 32299423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
