128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36973636)
1. Pooling test statistics across multiply imputed datasets for nonnormal items.
Jia F
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1229-1243. PubMed ID: 36973636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the fit of structural equation models with multiply imputed data.
Enders CK; Mansolf M
Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):76-93. PubMed ID: 27893216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of multiple imputation strategies to deal with missing nonnormal data in structural equation modeling.
Jia F; Wu W
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):3100-3119. PubMed ID: 36038813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multiple imputation score test for model modification in structural equation models.
Mansolf M; Jorgensen TD; Enders CK
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):393-411. PubMed ID: 31621350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inference following multiple imputation for generalized additive models: an investigation of the median p-value rule with applications to the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry and Colorado COVID-19 hospitalization data.
Bolt MA; MaWhinney S; Pattee JW; Erlandson KM; Badesch DB; Peterson RA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):148. PubMed ID: 35597908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of longitudinal clinical trials with missing data using multiple imputation in conjunction with robust regression.
Mehrotra DV; Li X; Liu J; Lu K
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1250-9. PubMed ID: 22994905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abstract: Evaluation of Test Statistics for Robust Structural Equation Modeling With Nonnormal Missing Data.
Tong X; Zhang Z; Yuan KH
Multivariate Behav Res; 2011 Nov; 46(6):1016. PubMed ID: 26736130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simple pooling method for variable selection in multiply imputed datasets outperformed complex methods.
Panken AM; Heymans MW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):214. PubMed ID: 35927610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk.
Sullivan TR; Lee KJ; Ryan P; Salter AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28877666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance Tests and Estimates for
van Ginkel JR
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(4):514-529. PubMed ID: 30822143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the Computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the Mean-And-Variance Corrected Test Statistic with Nonnormal Data in SEM.
Savalei V
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(3):419-429. PubMed ID: 29624085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A two-step semiparametric method to accommodate sampling weights in multiple imputation.
Zhou H; Elliott MR; Raghunathan TE
Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):242-52. PubMed ID: 26393409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Appropriately estimating the standardized average treatment effect with missing data: A simulation and primer.
Anderson SF
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Jan; 56(1):199-232. PubMed ID: 36547758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods for significance testing of categorical covariates in logistic regression models after multiple imputation: power and applicability analysis.
Eekhout I; van de Wiel MA; Heymans MW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):129. PubMed ID: 28830466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative Multiple Imputation Inference for Categorical Structural Equation Modeling.
Chung S; Cai L
Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(3):323-337. PubMed ID: 30950634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximum likelihood versus multiple imputation for missing data in small longitudinal samples with nonnormality.
Shin T; Davison ML; Long JD
Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):426-449. PubMed ID: 27709974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data.
Lee T; Shi D
Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):466-485. PubMed ID: 33507765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pooling methods for likelihood ratio tests in multiply imputed data sets.
Grund S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
Psychol Methods; 2023 Oct; 28(5):1207-1221. PubMed ID: 37104764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A bias-corrected estimator in multiple imputation for missing data.
Tomita H; Fujisawa H; Henmi M
Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3373-3386. PubMed ID: 29845646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A robust imputation method for missing responses and covariates in sample selection models.
Ogundimu EO; Collins GS
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):102-116. PubMed ID: 28679340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
