178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36973657)
1. Development and validation of an intuitive biomechanics-based method for intraocular pressure measurement: a modal analysis approach.
Hsu FL; Shih PJ; Wang IJ
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):124. PubMed ID: 36973657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Alterations in intraocular pressure and the CorVis parameters after LASIK].
Anton A; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Wecker T; Lübke J; Heinzelmann S; Lapp T; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; Maier P
Ophthalmologe; 2017 May; 114(5):445-449. PubMed ID: 27620918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of 4 tonometers in measuring IOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, SMILE, and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy.
Chen S; Lopes BT; Huang W; Zheng X; Wang J; Zhu R; Vinciguerra R; Li Y; Wang Q; Li H; Bao F; Elsheikh A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 46(7):967-974. PubMed ID: 32271270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.
Lee H; Roberts CJ; Kim TI; Ambrósio R; Elsheikh A; Yong Kang DS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1495-1503. PubMed ID: 29335093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.
Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK.
Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wei P; Zhang J; Zhao W; Li L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):4180-6. PubMed ID: 27548888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in Intraocular Pressure after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis.
Chou CC; Shih PJ; Lin HC; Chen JP; Yen JY; Wang IJ
J Ophthalmol; 2021; 2021():5592195. PubMed ID: 33777445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra-High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST).
Sefat SM; Wiltfang R; Bechmann M; Mayer WJ; Kampik A; Kook D
Curr Eye Res; 2016 Jul; 41(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 26554611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in corneal biomechanics during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).
Cao K; Liu L; Yu T; Chen F; Bai J; Liu T
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Apr; 35(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 31463819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Applanation tonometry in "normal" patients and patients after LASIK].
Kohlhaas M; Spörl E; Böhm AG; Pollack K; Sandner D; Pillunat LE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Oct; 222(10):823-6. PubMed ID: 16240277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement of ocular response analyzer cornea compensated IOP with corvis ST biomechanical IOP following Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK.
Salouti R; Razeghinejad R; Eslami G; Zare M; Salouti K; Ghoreyshi M; Nowroozzadeh MH
Eye (Lond); 2023 Feb; 37(2):263-266. PubMed ID: 35013609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of a new intraocular pressure estimate for patients with soft corneas.
Chen KJ; Eliasy A; Vinciguerra R; Abass A; Lopes BT; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 31326228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.
Chen KJ; Joda A; Vinciguerra R; Eliasy A; Sefat SMM; Kook D; Geraghty B; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 May; 44(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 29685776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
