These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36974970)

  • 1. The PhysioVP-AF study, a randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical benefit of physiological ventricular pacing vs. managed ventricular pacing for persistent atrial fibrillation prevention in patients with prolonged atrioventricular conduction: design and rationale.
    Pastore G; Bertini M; Bonanno C; Coluccia G; Dell'Era G; De Mattia L; Grieco D; Katsouras G; Maines M; Marcantoni L; Marinaccio L; Paglino G; Palmisano P; Ziacchi M; Zoppo F; Noventa F
    Europace; 2023 May; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 36974970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Occurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation during pacing for sinus node disease: The influence of His bundle pacing versus managed ventricular pacing.
    Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Lanza D; Maines M; Noventa F; Corbucci G; Rigatelli G; Baracca E; Roncon L; Zanon F
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):110-116. PubMed ID: 33179400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study.
    Chen S; Chen K; Tao Q; Zheng L; Shen F; Wu S; Fan J; Xu G; Wang L; Zhou X; Zhang S;
    Europace; 2014 Nov; 16(11):1595-602. PubMed ID: 24706091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term clinical effects of ventricular pacing reduction with a changeover mode to minimize ventricular pacing in a general pacemaker population.
    Stockburger M; Boveda S; Moreno J; Da Costa A; Hatala R; Brachmann J; Butter C; Garcia Seara J; Rolando M; Defaye P
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Jan; 36(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 25179761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimizing ventricular pacing by a novel atrioventricular (AV) delay hysteresis algorithm in patients with intact or compromised intrinsic AV conduction and different atrial and ventricular lead locations.
    Pakarinen S; Toivonen L
    Ann Med; 2013 Sep; 45(5-6):438-45. PubMed ID: 23768003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of PR interval and pacing mode on persistent atrial fibrillation incidence in dual chamber pacemaker patients: a sub-study of the international randomized MINERVA trial.
    Boriani G; Pieragnoli P; Botto GL; Puererfellner H; Mont L; Ziacchi M; Manolis AS; Gulizia M; Tukkie R; Landolina M; Ricciardi G; Cicconelli M; Grammatico A; Biffi M
    Europace; 2019 Apr; 21(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 30649270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Near elimination of ventricular pacing in SafeR mode compared to DDD modes: a randomized study of 422 patients.
    Davy JM; Hoffmann E; Frey A; Jocham K; Rossi S; Dupuis JM; Frabetti L; Ducloux P; Prades E; Jauvert G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 22309303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Support of spontaneous atrioventricular conduction in patients with DDR(R) pacemakers: effectiveness and safety].
    Himmrich E; Krämer LI; Fischer W; Dörr T; Reinecke H;
    Herz; 2001 Feb; 26(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 11258112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study.
    Mutagaywa RK; Tumaini B; Chin A
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2021 Jan-Feb 23; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 32946543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction.
    Velayuthan R; Sukumar SK; Bootla D; Balaguru S; Anantharaj A; Satheesh S; Selvaraj RJ
    Indian Heart J; 2024; 76(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 38070672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial.
    Stockburger M; Defaye P; Boveda S; Stancak B; Lazarus A; Sipötz J; Nardi S; Rolando M; Moreno J
    Europace; 2016 May; 18(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26612882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adverse effects of first-degree AV-block in patients with sinus node dysfunction: data from the mode selection trial.
    Holmqvist F; Hellkamp AS; Lee KL; Lamas GA; Daubert JP;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Sep; 37(9):1111-9. PubMed ID: 24797760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
    Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Atrioventricular Interval Extension Is Highly Efficient in Preventing Unnecessary Right Ventricular Pacing in Sinus Node Disease: A Randomized Cross-Over Study Versus Dual- to Atrial Single-Chamber Mode Switch.
    Calvi V; Pisanò EC; Brieda M; Melissano D; Castaldi B; Guastaferro C; Nigro G; Madalosso M; Orsida D; Rovai N; Gargaro A; Capucci A
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 May; 3(5):482-490. PubMed ID: 29759604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atrial pacing site and atrioventricular conduction in patients paced for sinus node disease.
    Watabe T; Abe H; Kohno R; Oginosawa Y; Hayashi K; Ohe H; Tamura M; Takeuchi M; Otsuji Y
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1224-31. PubMed ID: 24946835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode.
    Nitardy A; Langreck H; Dietz R; Stockburger M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 98(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18853096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between right ventricular pacing and atrial fibrillation burden and disease progression in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the long-MinVPACE study.
    Veasey RA; Arya A; Silberbauer J; Sharma V; Lloyd GW; Patel NR; Sulke AN
    Europace; 2011 Jun; 13(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 21208945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac pacing strategies and post-implantation risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure events in sinus node dysfunction patients: a collaborative analysis of over 6000 patients.
    Chen S; Wang Z; Kiuchi MG; Andrea BR; Krucoff MW; Liu S; Pürerfellner H
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 105(8):687-698. PubMed ID: 26913516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term outcome of single-chamber atrial pacing compared with dual-chamber pacing in patients with sinus-node dysfunction and intact atrioventricular node conduction.
    Kim WH; Joung B; Shim J; Park JS; Hwang ES; Pak HN; Kim S; Lee M
    Yonsei Med J; 2010 Nov; 51(6):832-7. PubMed ID: 20879047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between ventricular pacing and persistent atrial fibrillation in patients indicated to elective pacemaker replacement: Results of the Prefer for Elective Replacement MVP (PreFER MVP) randomized study.
    Ricci RP; Botto GL; Bénézet JM; Nielsen JC; De Roy L; Piot O; Quesada A; Quaglione R; Vaccari D; Mangoni L; Grammatico A; Kozák M;
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 Nov; 12(11):2239-46. PubMed ID: 26142300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.