These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3697512)
1. A comparison of static cytofluorometry and flow cytometry for the estimation of ploidy and DNA replication in human breast cancer. Stål O; Klintenberg C; Franzen G; Risberg B; Arvidsson S; Bjelkenkrantz K; Skoog L; Nordenskjöld B Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1986; 7(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 3697512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of static and flow cytofluorometry for estimation of DNA index and S-phase fraction in fresh and paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma tissue. Wingren S; Hatschek T; Stål O; Boeryd B; Nordenskjöld B Acta Oncol; 1988; 27(6b):793-7. PubMed ID: 3069121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA flow cytometry and prognostic factors in 1331 frozen breast cancer specimens. Dressler LG; Seamer LC; Owens MA; Clark GM; McGuire WL Cancer; 1988 Feb; 61(3):420-7. PubMed ID: 3338012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Thymidine labeling index, flow cytometric S-phase measurement, and DNA index in human tumors. Comparisons and correlations. Meyer JS; Coplin MD Am J Clin Pathol; 1988 May; 89(5):586-95. PubMed ID: 3358366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proliferative characteristics of primary and metastatic human solid tumors by DNA flow cytometry. Frankfurt OS; Greco WR; Slocum HK; Arbuck SG; Gamarra M; Pavelic ZP; Rustum YM Cytometry; 1984 Nov; 5(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 6518938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of flow and image cytometry for DNA content analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue in breast carcinoma. Chen TL; Luo I; Mikhail N; Rasková J; Raska K Cytometry; 1995 Sep; 22(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 8556949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases. Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tumor heterogeneity in DNA ploidy of renal cell carcinomas as revealed by static cytofluorometry and flow cytometry]. Kushima M; Konishi T; Okada Y; Tomoyoshi T; Kushima R; Hattori T Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 85(3):473-80. PubMed ID: 8170079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tissue section image analysis of breast neoplasms. Evidence of false aneuploidy. Sapi Z; Hendricks JB; Pharis PG; Wilkinson EJ Am J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jun; 99(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 8322706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interlaboratory reproducibility of semiautomated cell cycle analysis of flow cytometry DNA-histograms obtained from fresh material of 1,295 breast cancer cases. Bergers E; Montironi R; van Diest PJ; Prete E; Baak JP Hum Pathol; 1996 Jun; 27(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 8666364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ploidy pattern and cell cycle in breast cancer as detected by image analysis and flow cytometry. Luzi P; Bruni A; Mangiavacchi P; Cevenini G; Marini D; Tosi P Cytometry; 1994 Jun; 18(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 7924702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility and comparison of quantitative DNA histogram features obtained with a scanning microdensitometer and a flow cytometer in breast cancers. Uyterlinde AM; Smeulders AW; Baak JP Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1989 Oct; 11(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 2553035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative DNA analysis in breast carcinomas: a comparison between image analysis and flow cytometry. Lee AK; Dugan J; Hamilton WM; Cook L; Heatley G; Kamat B; Silverman ML Mod Pathol; 1991 Mar; 4(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 2047381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA ploidy in intraductal breast carcinomas. Aasmundstad TA; Haugen OA Eur J Cancer; 1990; 26(9):956-9. PubMed ID: 2177615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA ploidy analysis by laser scanning cytometry (LSC) in colorectal cancers and comparison with flow cytometry. Sasaki K; Kurose A; Miura Y; Sato T; Ikeda E Cytometry; 1996 Feb; 23(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 8742168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA analysis of breast cancer by flow cytometry & correlation with other prognostic parameters. Redkar AA; Balsara BR; Bhisey AN; Sampat MB; Mittra I Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():223-9. PubMed ID: 1428060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tumour heterogeneity of DNA cell cycle variables in breast cancer measured by flow cytometry. Bergers E; van Diest PJ; Baak JP J Clin Pathol; 1996 Nov; 49(11):931-7. PubMed ID: 8944615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are a reliable internal standard for the flow cytometric DNA analysis of frozen malignant breast biopsies. Benn DE; Robinson BG Cytometry; 1996 Jun; 26(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 8817093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of DNA flow cytometric results and other prognostic factors in primary breast cancer. Feichter GE; Mueller A; Kaufmann M; Haag D; Born IA; Abel U; Klinga K; Kubli F; Goerttler K Int J Cancer; 1988 Jun; 41(6):823-8. PubMed ID: 3372059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of variation in DNA flow cytometric analyses from paraffin-embedded breast cancers. Evaluation of the grading efficiency of ploidy determination, DNA index, and S-phase fraction. Collan Y; Klemi P; Kallioniemi OP; Joensuu H; Nordling S; Eskelinen M Pathol Res Pract; 1992 Jun; 188(4-5):581-6. PubMed ID: 1409093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]