200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36975464)
21. Automated Versus Handheld Breast Ultrasound for Evaluating Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Breast Cancer.
Kim SM; Jang M; Yun B; Shin SU; Rim J; Kang E; Kim EK; Shin HC; Park SY; Kim B
Korean J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 25(2):146-156. PubMed ID: 38238017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?
Gu Y; Tian J; Ran H; Ren W; Chang C; Yuan J; Kang C; Deng Y; Wang H; Luo B; Guo S; Zhou Q; Xue E; Zhan W; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang C; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu J; Chen W; Zhang Y; Li J; Wang H; Jiang Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Jun; 22(4):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 34815174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic Performance Using Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer in Chinese Women Aged 40 Years or Older: A Comparative Study.
Zhang L; Bao LY; Tan YJ; Zhu LQ; Xu XJ; Zhu QQ; Shan YN; Zhao J; Xie LS; Liu J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3137-3144. PubMed ID: 31563481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Utility of the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Category 4 Breast Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Study in China.
Gu Y; Tian JW; Ran HT; Ren WD; Chang C; Yuan JJ; Kang CS; Deng YB; Wang H; Luo BM; Guo SL; Zhou Q; Xue ES; Zhan WW; Zhou Q; Li J; Zhou P; Zhang CQ; Chen M; Gu Y; Xu JF; Chen W; Zhang YH; Wang HQ; Li JC; Wang HY; Jiang YX
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S26-S34. PubMed ID: 32768352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Elastography Assisted BI-RADS in the Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4a Lesions in China.
Tang L; Wang Y; Gong H; Chen M
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Feb; 42(2):453-461. PubMed ID: 35811402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Automated breast ultrasound vs. handheld ultrasound: BI-RADS classification, duration of the examination and patient comfort].
Prosch H; Halbwachs C; Strobl C; Reisner LM; Hondl M; Weber M; Mostbeck GH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Oct; 32(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 21630181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison between execution and reading time of 3D ABUS versus HHUS.
Brunetti N; De Giorgis S; Zawaideh J; Rossi F; Calabrese M; Tagliafico AS
Radiol Med; 2020 Dec; 125(12):1243-1248. PubMed ID: 32367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.
Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study.
Neuschler EI; Lavin PT; Tucker FL; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Dogan BE; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Young CA; Butler R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 29975115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.
Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An Improved Nomogram to Reduce False-Positive Biopsy Rates of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Ultrasonography Category 4A Lesions.
Hai L; Feng Y; Zhao J; Tang Q; Wang X; Cao X; Xiao C
Cancer Control; 2022; 29():10732748221122703. PubMed ID: 37735939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Utility and Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Evaluating Pure Non-Mass Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Shin SU; Yi A; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 32729267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data.
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21498319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproducibility of Automated Breast Ultrasonography and Handheld Ultrasonography for Breast Lesion Size Measurement.
Park KW; Ko EY; Park S; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Kwon MR
Ultrasound Q; 2022 Jan; 38(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 35001027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The image quality and lesion characterization of breast using automated whole-breast ultrasound: A comparison with handheld ultrasound.
An YY; Kim SH; Kang BJ
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1232-5. PubMed ID: 25975896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
