153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36976116)
1. Comparison of Image Quality and Quantification Parameters between Q.Clear and OSEM Reconstruction Methods on FDG-PET/CT Images in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Naghavi-Behzad M; Vogsen M; Gerke O; Dahlsgaard-Wallenius SE; Nissen HJ; Jakobsen NM; Braad PE; Vilstrup MH; Deak P; Hildebrandt MG; Andersen TL
J Imaging; 2023 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 36976116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical effectiveness of reconstructing
Usmani S; Ahmed N; Gnanasegaran G; Rasheed R; Marafi F; Alnaaimi M; Omar M; Musbah A; Al Kandari F; De Schepper S; Van den Wyngaert T
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20210043. PubMed ID: 33571003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations.
Tatsumi M; Soeda F; Kamiya T; Ueda J; Katayama D; Matsunaga K; Watabe T; Kato H; Tomiyama N
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():707023. PubMed ID: 34485143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.
Witkowska-Patena E; Budzyńska A; Giżewska A; Dziuk M; Walęcka-Mazur A
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 34(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 31902120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images?
Matti A; Lima GM; Pettinato C; Pietrobon F; Martinelli F; Fanti S
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jun; 53(3):216-222. PubMed ID: 31231442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on
Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Farzanehfar S; Ghafarian P; Moafpurian Y; Ay M
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Oct; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 37843705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR.
Tian D; Yang H; Li Y; Cui B; Lu J
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 35006411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A proper protocol for routine
Hu H; Huang Y; Sun H; Zhou K; Jiang L; Zhong J; Chen L; Wang L; Han Y; Wu H
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Sep; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 37695324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes of [
Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment response assessment in [
Dolci C; Spadavecchia C; Crivellaro C; De Ponti E; Todde S; Morzenti S; Turolla EA; Crespi A; Guerra L; Landoni C
Phys Med; 2019 Jan; 57():177-182. PubMed ID: 30738523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the Q.Clear reconstruction algorithm on the interpretation of PET/CT images in patients with lymphoma.
Wyrzykowski M; Siminiak N; Kaźmierczak M; Ruchała M; Czepczyński R
EJNMMI Res; 2020 Aug; 10(1):99. PubMed ID: 32845406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm on image quality in novel digital PET/CT: clinical implications for the assessment of lung tumors.
Messerli M; Stolzmann P; Egger-Sigg M; Trinckauf J; D'Aguanno S; Burger IA; von Schulthess GK; Kaufmann PA; Huellner MW
EJNMMI Phys; 2018 Sep; 5(1):27. PubMed ID: 30255439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
