These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36976819)

  • 1. Validation of web-based audiometry version of HEARZAP.
    P PR; Ramkumar V
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283519. PubMed ID: 36976819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilizing True Wireless Stereo Earbuds in Automated Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Guo Z; Yu G; Zhou H; Wang X; Lu Y; Meng Q
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211057367. PubMed ID: 34796771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry.
    Ho AT; Hildreth AJ; Lindsey L
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):876-83. PubMed ID: 20179426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic pure-tone audiometry in schools: mobile testing without a sound-treated environment.
    Swanepoel de W; Maclennan-Smith F; Hall JW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):992-1000. PubMed ID: 24384084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extended High-Frequency Smartphone Audiometry: Validity and Reliability.
    Bornman M; Swanepoel W; De Jager LB; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 30461416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults.
    Maclennan-Smith F; Swanepoel de W; Hall JW
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 23140522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration and initial validation of a low-cost computer-based screening audiometer coupled to consumer insert phone-earmuff combination for boothless audiometry.
    Seluakumaran K; Shaharudin MN
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Oct; 61(10):850-858. PubMed ID: 34455907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smartphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary health-care contexts.
    Sandström J; Swanepoel de W; Carel Myburgh H; Laurent C
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 26795898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population.
    Thompson GP; Sladen DP; Borst BJ; Still OL
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Nov; 153(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 26183518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
    Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
    Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing Agreement between Frequency-Specific Chirp Auditory Steady-State Response and Pure Tone Audiometry in Adults by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
    Chen M; Wei Y; Wang X; Liu L; Liu M; Jiang G; Wei F
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2022; 84(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 33979798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of air-conduction and bone-conduction hearing thresholds for pure tones and octave-band filtered sound effects.
    Abouchacra KS; Letowski T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Sep; 10(8):422-8. PubMed ID: 10813642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online digital audiometry vs. conventional audiometry: a multi-centre comparative clinical study.
    Thai-Van H; Joly CA; Idriss S; Melki JB; Desmettre M; Bonneuil M; Veuillet E; Ionescu E; Reynard P
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):362-367. PubMed ID: 35337229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.