These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36976819)

  • 21. Online digital audiometry vs. conventional audiometry: a multi-centre comparative clinical study.
    Thai-Van H; Joly CA; Idriss S; Melki JB; Desmettre M; Bonneuil M; Veuillet E; Ionescu E; Reynard P
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):362-367. PubMed ID: 35337229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Self-administered hearing loss screening using an interactive, tablet play audiometer with ear bud headphones.
    Yeung JC; Heley S; Beauregard Y; Champagne S; Bromwich MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1248-52. PubMed ID: 26055197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparisons of air-conduction hearing thresholds between manual and automated methods in a commercial audiometer.
    Liu H; Fu X; Li M; Wang S
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1292395. PubMed ID: 38188027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment.
    Storey KK; Muñoz K; Nelson L; Larsen J; White K
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):730-6. PubMed ID: 24909592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation.
    Swanepoel de W; Matthysen C; Eikelboom RH; Clark JL; Hall JW
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):777-85. PubMed ID: 26514954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer.
    Bastianelli M; Mark AE; McAfee A; Schramm D; Lefrançois R; Bromwich M
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):59. PubMed ID: 31699157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Distribution characteristics of normal pure-tone thresholds.
    Margolis RH; Wilson RH; Popelka GR; Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Saly GL
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(11):796-805. PubMed ID: 25938502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. High-frequency air-conduction and electric bone-conduction audiometry. Age and sex variations.
    Löppönen H; Sorri M; Bloigu R
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 1842287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Virtual audiometer: technology integrated to teaching.
    Araújo DP; Araújo MEB; Alves ERA; Jales JMR; Araújo ES
    Codas; 2021; 33(6):e20200287. PubMed ID: 34550172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and Validation of a Portable Hearing Self-Testing System Based on a Notebook Personal Computer.
    Liu Y; Yang D; Xiong F; Yu L; Ji F; Wang QJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):716-723. PubMed ID: 26333879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hearing screening with portable screening pure-tone audiometer and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wang YF; Wang SS; Tai CC; Lin LC; Shiao AS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Jun; 65(6):285-92. PubMed ID: 12201570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children.
    Rahko-Laitila P; Karma P; Laippala P; Salmelin R; Sipilä M; Manninen M; Rahko T
    Audiology; 2001; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Carhart notch effect in otosclerotic ears measured by electric bone-conduction audiometry.
    Löppönen H; Laitakari K
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):160-2. PubMed ID: 11318454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validity of automated threshold audiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mahomed F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH; Soer M
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):745-52. PubMed ID: 24165302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Mngemane S; Molemong S; Mkwanazi H; Tutshini S
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 20575723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated hearing tests: applying the otogram to patients who are difficult to test.
    Yu J; Ostevik A; Hodgetts B; Ho A
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 40(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 22420392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adapting Audiology Procedures During the Pandemic: Validity and Efficacy of Testing Outside a Sound Booth.
    Serpanos YC; Hobbs M; Nunez K; Gambino L; Butler J
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 34965363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.