These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36978429)

  • 1. Microbiological Retention on PTFE versus Silk Suture: A Quantitative Pilot Study in Third Molar Surgery.
    Parrini S; Bovicelli A; Chisci G
    Antibiotics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36978429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and microbiological comparison of knotless/barbed and silk sutures for impacted third-molar surgery.
    Uysal AE; Sencimen M; Ozkan A; Hosbul T; Samur Erguven S; Parlak F
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Aug; 72(4):161-167. PubMed ID: 36951010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trusilk
    Balakrishna R; Poojary D; R A; Sali S; Moharana AK; Ts D
    F1000Res; 2022; 11():689. PubMed ID: 36128557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bacterial Adherence Around Sutures of Different Material at Grafted Site: A Microbiological Analysis.
    Mahesh L; Kumar VR; Jain A; Shukla S; Aragoneses JM; Martínez González JM; Fernández-Domínguez M; Calvo-Guirado JL
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Sep; 12(18):. PubMed ID: 31487852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial adherence to silk and expanded polytatrafluorethilene sutures: an in vivo human study.
    Scarano A; Inchingolo F; Leo L; Buggea C; Crisante A; Greco Lucchina A; Scogna G
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(2 Suppl. 1):205-210. PubMed ID: 34281318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or silk suture for closure of surgical wound following removal of an impacted mandibular third molar: A randomized controlled study.
    Oladega AA; James O; Adeyemo WL
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 30501926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antibacterial suture vs silk for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. A randomized clinical study.
    Sala-Pérez S; López-Ramírez M; Quinteros-Borgarello M; Valmaseda-Castellón E; Gay-Escoda C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2016 Jan; 21(1):e95-102. PubMed ID: 26615503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbiological analysis of bacterial plaque on three different threads in oral surgery.
    Bucci M; Borgonovo A; Bianchi A; Zanellato A; Re D
    Minerva Stomatol; 2017 Feb; 66(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 27583530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Bacterial Colonization and Clinical Properties of Different Suture Materials in Dentoalveoler Surgery.
    Yaman D; Paksoy T; Ustaoğlu G; Demirci M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Feb; 80(2):313-326. PubMed ID: 34673005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human gingival tissue reactions to silk and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures.
    Leknes KN; Røynstrand IT; Selvig KA
    J Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 76(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 15830635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.
    Coulthard P; Bailey E; Esposito M; Furness S; Renton TF; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD004345. PubMed ID: 25069437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study.
    Asher R; Chacartchi T; Tandlich M; Shapira L; Polak D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):559-565. PubMed ID: 29717362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In Vitro Tensile Strength Study on Suturing Technique and Material.
    González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Espanya-Grifoll D; España-Tost A; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    J Oral Implantol; 2017 Jun; 43(3):169-174. PubMed ID: 28301295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of knotless suture as a wound closure agent for impacted third molar - A split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Ramkumar Ceyar KA; Thulasidoss GP; Raja Sethupathy Cheeman S; Sagadevan S; Panneerselvam E; Krishna Kumar Raja VB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Oct; 48(10):1004-1008. PubMed ID: 32873466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbial adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients undergoing dental surgery.
    Banche G; Roana J; Mandras N; Amasio M; Gallesio C; Allizond V; Angeretti A; Tullio V; Cuffini AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 65(8):1503-7. PubMed ID: 17656275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of immediate post-extraction socket irrigation on development of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar removal: a prospective split-mouth study, preliminary report.
    Tolstunov L
    Br Dent J; 2012 Dec; 213(12):597-601. PubMed ID: 23257808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of One-Suture and Sutureless Techniques on Postoperative Healing After Third Molar Surgery.
    Alkadi S; Stassen L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Apr; 77(4):703.e1-703.e16. PubMed ID: 30611694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sutures in dentistry. Traditional and PTFE materials].
    La Scala G; Lleo MM
    Dent Cadmos; 1990 Sep; 58(14):54-8, 61. PubMed ID: 2279592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative microbiological study of polyglycolic acid and silk sutures in oral surgical procedures.
    T R M; Pal S; K R AK; Bhat P; Raghupathy RK
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2021 Dec; 70(6):239-247. PubMed ID: 34132506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative recovery after mandibular third molar surgery: a criteria for selection of type of surgical site closure.
    Damodar ND; Nandakumar H; Srinath NM
    Gen Dent; 2013; 61(3):e9-e13. PubMed ID: 23649587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.