161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36980504)
1. Low-Risk Women with Suspicious Microcalcifications in Mammography-Can an Additional Breast MRI Reduce the Biopsy Rate?
Pöschke P; Wenkel E; Hack CC; Beckmann MW; Uder M; Ohlmeyer S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 36980504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study.
Taskin F; Kalayci CB; Tuncbilek N; Soydemir E; Kurt N; Kaya H; Aribal E
Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar; 31(3):1718-1726. PubMed ID: 32939619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?
Baltzer PAT; Bennani-Baiti B; Stöttinger A; Bumberger A; Kapetas P; Clauser P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():70-74. PubMed ID: 29122667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can magnetic resonance imaging obviate the need for biopsy for microcalcifications?
Yamamoto S; Chishima T
Gland Surg; 2017 Aug; 6(4):302-307. PubMed ID: 28861368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Added value of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging for assessing suspicious microcalcification on screening mammography-a prospective study.
Gweon HM; Eun NL; Youk JH; Jeong J; Bae SJ; Ahn SG; Kim JA; Son EJ
Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):815-821. PubMed ID: 34342691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the stereotactic 8G vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the histologic evaluation of suspicious mammography findings (BI-RADS IV).
Diebold T; Hahn T; Solbach C; Rody A; Balzer JO; Hansmann ML; Marx A; Viana F; Peters J; Jacobi V; Kaufmann M; Vogl TJ
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jul; 40(7):465-71. PubMed ID: 15973139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of DCE- MRI of the breast as a diagnostic tool in assessing amorphous calcifications in screening mammography.
Wang S; Wang H; Li Y; Lou J; Zou Q; Jiang Y; Wu F; Tang Y; Wang S
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1151500. PubMed ID: 37182168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic characteristics and vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) of non-palpable breast lesions.
Ventrella V; Tufaro A; Zito FA; Addante M; Stea B; Dentamaro R; D'Amico C; Paradiso A
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 21565889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast US in patients who had microcalcifications with low concern of malignancy on screening mammography.
Kang SS; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Aug; 67(2):285-291. PubMed ID: 17703906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.
Bluemke DA; Gatsonis CA; Chen MH; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Lehman C; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Smazal SF; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Schnall MD
JAMA; 2004 Dec; 292(22):2735-42. PubMed ID: 15585733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 268 nonpalpable lesions.
Tonegutti M; Girardi V
Radiol Med; 2008 Feb; 113(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 18338128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?
Bitencourt AG; Lima EN; Macedo BR; Conrado JL; Marques EF; Chojniak R
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1893-1900. PubMed ID: 27585658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Study in the Evaluation of BI-RADS Categories 3 and 4 Microcalcifications: Is it Worth Performing?
Shimauchi A; Machida Y; Maeda I; Fukuma E; Hoshi K; Tozaki M
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 29191685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
