168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36980945)
1. Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Software for Single Cell STR Analysis.
Huffman K; Ballantyne J
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell Subsampling Recovers Probative DNA Profile Information from Unresolvable/Undetectable Minor Donors in Mixtures.
Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 35885899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.
Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35277229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carrying out common DNA donor analysis using DBLR™ on two or five-cell mini-mixture subsamples for improved discrimination power in complex DNA mixtures.
Huffman K; Kruijver M; Ballantyne J; Taylor D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Sep; 66():102908. PubMed ID: 37402330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Y-STR mixture deconvolution by single-cell analysis.
Huffman K; Hanson E; Ballantyne J
J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jan; 68(1):275-288. PubMed ID: 36183153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.
Adamowicz MS; Rambo TN; Clarke JL
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.
Coble MD; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():219-224. PubMed ID: 30458407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.
Benschop CCG; van der Gaag KJ; de Vreede J; Backx AJ; de Leeuw RH; Zuñiga S; Hoogenboom J; de Knijff P; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102489. PubMed ID: 33677249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Searching CODIS with binary conversions of STRmix interpretations.
Myers S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102569. PubMed ID: 34428671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRMix™ and TrueAllele™.
Thompson WC
J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):1049-1063. PubMed ID: 36847295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EFMrep: An extension of EuroForMix for improved combination of STR DNA mixture profiles.
Bleka Ø; Prieto L; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102771. PubMed ID: 36075175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the LUS in sequence allele designations to facilitate probabilistic genotyping of NGS-based STR typing results.
Just RS; Irwin JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():197-205. PubMed ID: 29525576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probabilistic Genotyping of Single Cell Replicates from Mixtures Involving First-Degree Relatives Prevents the False Inclusions of Non-Donor Relatives.
Huffman K; Ballantyne J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 36140825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.
Bright JA; Richards R; Kruijver M; Kelly H; McGovern C; Magee A; McWhorter A; Ciecko A; Peck B; Baumgartner C; Buettner C; McWilliams S; McKenna C; Gallacher C; Mallinder B; Wright D; Johnson D; Catella D; Lien E; O'Connor C; Duncan G; Bundy J; Echard J; Lowe J; Stewart J; Corrado K; Gentile S; Kaplan M; Hassler M; McDonald N; Hulme P; Oefelein RH; Montpetit S; Strong M; Noël S; Malsom S; Myers S; Welti S; Moretti T; McMahon T; Grill T; Kalafut T; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Beamer V; Taylor DA; Buckleton JS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():11-24. PubMed ID: 29367014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
