These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36981031)

  • 1. Development of Improved DNA Collection and Extraction Methods for Handled Documents.
    Morgan AG; Prinz M
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36981031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-destructive DNA recovery from handwritten documents using a dry vacuum technique.
    McLaughlin P; Hopkins C; Springer E; Prinz M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 33656180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review.
    Tozzo P; Mazzobel E; Marcante B; Delicati A; Caenazzo L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 36555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
    Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clean and clear (out): A neat method for the recovery of latent fingermarks from crime-scenes.
    Harush-Brosh Y; Hefetz I; Hauzer M; Mayuoni-Kirshenbaum L; Mashiach Y; Faerman M; Levin-Elad M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110049. PubMed ID: 31785509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of "touch" DNA recovery and room-temperature storage from assault rifle magazines.
    Tasker E; Roman MG; Akosile M; Mayes C; Hughes S; LaRue B
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Mar; 43():101658. PubMed ID: 31954956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A holistic approach for the selection of forensic DNA swabs.
    Comment D; Gouy A; Zingg C; Zieger M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111737. PubMed ID: 37247525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The DNA-Buster: The evaluation of an alternative DNA recovery approach.
    Währer J; Kehm S; Allen M; Brauer L; Eidam O; Seiberle I; Kron S; Scheurer E; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102830. PubMed ID: 36702080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of swabbing solutions on DNA recovery from touch samples.
    Thomasma SM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 23278347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
    Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of DNA recovery on the subsequent quality of latent fingermarks.
    Fieldhouse S; Oravcova E; Walton-Williams L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():78-88. PubMed ID: 27572637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Touch DNA recovery from vehicle surfaces using different swabs.
    Giovanelli A; Grazinoli Garrido R; Rocha A; Hessab T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34725823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of the M-Vac® wet-vacuum system as a method for DNA recovery.
    Vickar T; Bache K; Daniel B; Frascione N
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 29895461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis.
    Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Optimized DNA Analysis Workflow for the Sampling, Extraction, and Concentration of DNA obtained from Archived Latent Fingerprints.
    Solomon AD; Hytinen ME; McClain AM; Miller MT; Dawson Cruz T
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 28382646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.