These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36981181)

  • 41. Consumers' preferences for freezing of meat to prevent toxoplasmosis- A stated preference approach.
    Lambooij MS; Veldwijk J; van Gils P; Mangen MJ; Over E; Suijkerbuijk A; Polder J; de Wit GA; Opsteegh M
    Meat Sci; 2019 Mar; 149():1-8. PubMed ID: 30448472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?
    Hempel C; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():309-318. PubMed ID: 26432955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers' behaviour and policy implications.
    Stiletto A; Trestini S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277048. PubMed ID: 36395097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of hedonic evaluation on consumers' preferences for beef attributes including its enrichment with n-3 and CLA fatty acids.
    Baba Y; Kallas Z; Costa-Font M; Gil JM; Realini CE
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jan; 111():9-17. PubMed ID: 26331961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Influence of quality labels on the formation of preferences of lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study.
    Bernabéu R; Rabadán A; El Orche NE; Díaz M
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():129-133. PubMed ID: 28968556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Australian consumers' attitudes to packaged fresh meat products with added microbial bioprotective cultures for shelf-life extension.
    Xu MM; Kaur M; Pillidge CJ; Torley PJ
    Meat Sci; 2023 Apr; 198():109095. PubMed ID: 36628895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Effects of Nutrition and Health Claim Information on Consumers' Sensory Preferences and Willingness to Pay.
    Hong X; Li C; Wang L; Gao Z; Wang M; Zhang H; Monahan FJ
    Foods; 2022 Nov; 11(21):. PubMed ID: 36360073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Consumers' willingness to buy meat and seafood products close to the expiry date: an exploratory study from Denmark.
    Pandey S; Bohl A; Favari V; Mora P; Phuyal S; Sojková E; Budhathoki M; Thomsen M
    Front Nutr; 2024; 11():1371634. PubMed ID: 38533462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Would You Buy Plant-Based Beef Patties? A Survey on Product Attribute Preference and Willingness to Pay among Consumers in Liaoning Province, China.
    Zhou M; Guan B; Huang L
    Nutrients; 2022 Oct; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36297077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Exploring Consumer Preference towards the On-Farm Slaughtering of Beef in Germany: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Lauterbach J; Bruns AJ; Häring AM
    Foods; 2023 Sep; 12(18):. PubMed ID: 37761182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simply red? The effects of distinct colours and sustainable production methods on the consumers' preferences for healthier sweet peppers.
    Di Vita G; Zanchini R; Spina D; Vastola A; D'Amico M; Caracciolo F
    Heliyon; 2024 Apr; 10(8):e28661. PubMed ID: 38644900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.
    Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Consumer awareness of sustainable supply chains: A choice experiment on Parma ham PDO.
    Mazzocchi C; Orsi L; Zilia F; Costantini M; Bacenetti J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 836():155602. PubMed ID: 35523351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Consumers' preferences for fresh yam: a focus group study.
    Barlagne C; Cornet D; Blazy JM; Diman JL; Ozier-Lafontaine H
    Food Sci Nutr; 2017 Jan; 5(1):54-66. PubMed ID: 28070316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Analyzing the importance of attributes for Brazilian consumers to replace conventional beef with cultured meat.
    de Oliveira GA; Domingues CHF; Borges JAR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251432. PubMed ID: 33961686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.
    Verbeke W; Liu R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Consumer preferences for reduced antibiotic use in Danish pig production.
    Denver S; Jensen JD; Christensen T
    Prev Vet Med; 2021 Apr; 189():105310. PubMed ID: 33667759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken.
    Xu L; Yu M; Chen X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():679256. PubMed ID: 34484036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessment of the attributes that most affect the choice of minced meat and hamburgers.
    Cardona M; Hernández M; Fuentes A; Barat JM; Fernández-Segovia I
    Meat Sci; 2023 Apr; 198():109089. PubMed ID: 36603400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.