145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36981513)
1. A Clinical Prediction Model for Breast Cancer in Women Having Their First Mammogram.
Wangkulangkul P; Laohawiriyakamol S; Puttawibul P; Sangkhathat S; Pradaranon V; Ingviya T
Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Mar; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 36981513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model for predicting both breast cancer risk and non-breast cancer death among women > 55 years old.
Schonberg MA; Wolfson EA; Eliassen AH; Bertrand KA; Shvetsov YB; Rosner BA; Palmer JR; Ngo LH
Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Jan; 25(1):8. PubMed ID: 36694222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography.
Barlow WE; White E; Ballard-Barbash R; Vacek PM; Titus-Ernstoff L; Carney PA; Tice JA; Buist DS; Geller BM; Rosenberg R; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Sep; 98(17):1204-14. PubMed ID: 16954473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer Who Need Supplemental Screening.
Eriksson M; Czene K; Strand F; Zackrisson S; Lindholm P; Lång K; Förnvik D; Sartor H; Mavaddat N; Easton D; Hall P
Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):327-333. PubMed ID: 32897160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing breast cancer risk within the general screening population: developing a breast cancer risk model to identify higher risk women at mammographic screening.
Abdolell M; Payne JI; Caines J; Tsuruda K; Barnes PJ; Talbot PJ; Tong O; Brown P; Rivers-Bowerman M; Iles S
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5417-5426. PubMed ID: 32358648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(3):1-55. PubMed ID: 23074406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinicopathologic breast cancer characteristics: predictions using global textural features of the ipsilateral breast mammogram.
Kanbayti IH; Rae WID; McEntee MF; Gandomkar Z; Ekpo EU
Radiol Phys Technol; 2021 Sep; 14(3):248-261. PubMed ID: 34076829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association of Sociodemographic Factors, Breast Cancer Fear, and Perceived Self-Efficacy With Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Middle-Aged Nigerian Women.
Ezema RN; Igbokwe CC; Iwuagwu TE; Agbaje OS; Ofuebe JI; Abugu LI; Eze DD; Wamanyi Y
Breast Cancer (Auckl); 2021; 15():11782234211043651. PubMed ID: 34616153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the Gail model increase the predictive value of a positive mammogram in a European population screening setting? Results from a Spanish cohort.
Buron A; Vernet M; Roman M; Checa MA; Pérez JM; Sala M; Comas M; Murta-Nascimiento C; Castells X; Macià F
Breast; 2013 Feb; 22(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 23141024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparative Study of More than 8 Million Korean Women.
Hong S; Song SY; Park B; Suh M; Choi KS; Jung SE; Kim MJ; Lee EH; Lee CW; Jun JK
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 31793847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using the Health Belief Model to Predict the Uptake of Mammographic Screening Among Saudi Women.
AlJunidel R; Alaqel M; AlQahtani SH; AlOgaiel AM; ALJammaz F; Alshammari S
Cureus; 2020 Oct; 12(10):e11121. PubMed ID: 33133789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of previous benign breast biopsy on the interpretive performance of subsequent screening mammography.
Taplin SH; Abraham L; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Buist DS; Smith-Bindman R; Lehman C; Weaver D; Carney PA; Barlow WE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Jul; 102(14):1040-51. PubMed ID: 20601590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening knowledge among Hungarian women: a cross-sectional study.
Reményi Kissné D; Gede N; Szakács Z; Kiss I
BMC Womens Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):69. PubMed ID: 33588813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biennial screening mammography: How many women ask for more? Estimate of the interval mammogram rate in an organised population-based screening programme.
Carbonaro LA; Rizzo SS; Schiaffino S; Pisani Mainini A; Berger N; Trimboli RM; Sardanelli F
Radiol Med; 2021 Feb; 126(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 32577906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.
Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Cormack JB; Hanna LA; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Jong RA; Rebner M; Tosteson AN; Gatsonis CA;
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 18227537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
