These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36981541)

  • 1. Comparison of Three Video Laryngoscopes and Direct Laryngoscopy for Emergency Endotracheal Intubation While Wearing PPE-AGP: A Randomized, Crossover, Simulation Trial.
    Kluj P; Fedorczak A; Fedorczak M; Gaszyński T; Kułak C; Wasilewski M; Znyk M; Bartczak M; Ratajczyk P
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Mar; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 36981541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Airway Management in Disaster Response: A Manikin Study Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Prehospital Providers in Level C Personal Protective Equipment.
    Yousif S; Machan JT; Alaska Y; Suner S
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Aug; 32(4):352-356. PubMed ID: 28318455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of UESCOPE VL 400, I-View, Non-Channeled Airtraq Videolaryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.
    Ratajczyk P; Dolder P; Szmyd B; Gomez-Rios MA; Hogendorf P; Durczyński A; Gaszyński T
    Healthcare (Basel); 2024 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 38391827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the UEScope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin study.
    Szarpak L; Madziala A; Czekajlo M; Smereka J; Kaserer A; Dabrowski M; Madziala M; Yakubtsevich R; Ladny JR; Ruetzler K
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(36):e12085. PubMed ID: 30200089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of the bébé VieScope™ and Direct Laryngoscope for Use While Wearing PPE-AGP: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Trial.
    Wieczorek P; Szarpak L; Dabrowska A; Pruc M; Navolokina A; Raczynski A; Smereka J
    Children (Basel); 2022 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 36421223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ETView SL versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation Amid Simulated COVID-19 Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Crossover Study.
    Evrin T; Dabkowski M; Pruc M; Hernik J; Wieczorek W; Chabowski L; Wieczorek P; Chmielewski J; Feduniw S; Szarpak L
    J Clin Med; 2023 Aug; 12(15):. PubMed ID: 37568476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model.
    Hodnick R; Zitek T; Galster K; Johnson S; Bledsoe B; Ebbs D
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Dec; 32(6):621-624. PubMed ID: 28807073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
    Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Vie Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment.
    Szarpak L; Peacock FW; Rafique Z; Ladny JR; Nadolny K; Malysz M; Dabrowski M; Chirico F; Smereka J
    Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Mar; 53():122-126. PubMed ID: 35016094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct vs. Video-Laryngoscopy for Intubation by Paramedics of Simulated COVID-19 Patients under Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
    Gadek L; Szarpak L; Konge L; Dabrowski M; Telecka-Gadek D; Maslanka M; Drela WL; Jachowicz M; Iskrzycki L; Bialka S; Peacock FW; Smereka J
    J Clin Med; 2021 Dec; 10(24):. PubMed ID: 34945036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Miller laryngoscope and UEScope videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in four pediatric airway scenarios: a randomized, crossover simulation trial.
    Smereka J; Madziala M; Dunder D; Makomaska-Szaroszyk E; Szarpak L
    Eur J Pediatr; 2019 Jun; 178(6):937-945. PubMed ID: 30976922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Video Laryngoscopy Improves Intubation Times With Level C Personal Protective Equipment in Novice Physicians: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study.
    Pantazopoulos I; Kolonia K; Laou E; Mermiri M; Tsolaki V; Koutsovasilis A; Zakynthinos G; Gourgoulianis K; Arnaoutoglou E; Chalkias A
    J Emerg Med; 2021 Jun; 60(6):764-771. PubMed ID: 33579655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intubation Efficiency and Perceived Ease of Use of Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy While Wearing HazMat PPE: A Preliminary High-fidelity Mannequin Study.
    Aberle SJ; Sandefur BJ; Sunga KL; Campbell RL; Lohse CM; Alecastro Puls H; Laudon S; Sztajnkrycer MD
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2015 Jun; 30(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 25959708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario.
    Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 May; 35(5):796-797. PubMed ID: 28139309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of intubation devices in level C personal protective equipment: A cadaveric study.
    Scott Taylor R; Pitzer M; Goldman G; Czysz A; Simunich T; Ashurst J
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 36(6):922-925. PubMed ID: 29074070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in the emergency department.
    Vassiliadis J; Tzannes A; Hitos K; Brimble J; Fogg T
    Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Apr; 27(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 25640845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial.
    Szarpak Ł; Czyżewski Ł; Kurowski A; Truszewski Z
    Eur J Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 174(10):1325-32. PubMed ID: 25894914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endotracheal Intubation Using C-MAC Video Laryngoscope vs. Direct Laryngoscope While Wearing Personal Protective Equipment.
    Kim DS; Jeong D; Park JE; Lee GT; Shin TG; Chang H; Kim T; Lee SU; Yoon H; Cha WC; Sim YJ; Park SY; Hwang SY
    J Pers Med; 2022 Oct; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 36294859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Glidescope® Go™, King Vision™, Dahlhausen VL, I‑View™ and Macintosh laryngoscope use during difficult airway management simulation by experienced and inexperienced emergency medical staff: A randomized crossover manikin study.
    Moritz A; Leonhardt V; Prottengeier J; Birkholz T; Schmidt J; Irouschek A
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236474. PubMed ID: 32730283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.