149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36983143)
1. Comparison between Target Sample Check Illuminator and White Light Observation in Discriminating the Presence of Target Specimen for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Sample.
Koda H; Matsumoto K; Kawata S; Takeda Y; Onoyama T; Seki Y; Sakamoto Y; Shimosaka T; Hamamoto W; Yamashita T; Kurumi H; Yamaguchi N; Noma H; Isomoto H
J Clin Med; 2023 Mar; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 36983143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of a target sample check illuminator in the detection of target specimens in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy samples: Multicenter prospective study.
Matsumoto K; Hara K; Yasuda I; Itoi T; Kurumi H; Matsumoto S; Doi S; Honjo M; Takeda Y; Shibuya J; Noma H; Isomoto H
Dig Endosc; 2021 Sep; 33(6):970-976. PubMed ID: 33251622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a device for detecting target specimens from EUS-guided FNA samples.
Matsumoto K; Ueki M; Takeda Y; Harada K; Onoyama T; Kawata S; Ikebuchi Y; Imamoto R; Horie Y; Murawaki Y
Endosc Int Open; 2015 Dec; 3(6):E662-4. PubMed ID: 26716133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multicenter comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to evaluate microsatellite instability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Takagi T; Sugimoto M; Imamura H; Takahata Y; Nakajima Y; Suzuki R; Konno N; Asama H; Sato Y; Irie H; Nakamura J; Takasumi M; Hashimoto M; Kato T; Kobashi R; Hashimoto Y; Shibukawa G; Marubashi S; Hikichi T; Ohira H
Clin Endosc; 2023 Jan; 56(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 36646425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration combined with either endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration or endoscopic ultrasound using the EBUS scope-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing and staging mediastinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shen Y; Qin S; Jiang H
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2020; 75():e1759. PubMed ID: 33084766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized crossover trial comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors.
Iwai T; Kida M; Imaizumi H; Miyazawa S; Okuwaki K; Yamauchi H; Kaneko T; Hasegawa R; Miyata E; Koizumi W
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Mar; 46(3):228-233. PubMed ID: 29243411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle biopsy with histology specimen processing.
Ku L; Shahshahan MA; Hou LA; Eysselein VE; Reicher S
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Aug; 12(8):212-219. PubMed ID: 32879656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Analysis.
Kuraoka N; Hashimoto S; Matsui S; Terai S
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34071881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy histology with a 22-gauge Franseen needle and fine-needle aspiration liquid-based cytology with a conventional 25-gauge needle provide comparable diagnostic accuracy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Tomita Y; Torisu Y; Chiba M; Kinoshita Y; Akasu T; Shimamoto N; Abe T; Kanazawa K; Takakura K; Tsukinaga S; Nakano M; Toyoizumi H; Kato M; Saruta M
JGH Open; 2021 Sep; 5(9):1092-1096. PubMed ID: 34584980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions: Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison.
Gheorghiu M; Seicean A; Bolboacă SD; Rusu I; Seicean R; Pojoga C; Moșteanu O; Sparchez Z
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histopathological comparison of aspiration and biopsy needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with subepithelial lesions.
Watanabe M; Okuwaki K; Kida M; Tadehara M; Adachi K; Masutani H; Tamaki A; Imaizumi H; Iwai T; Yamauchi H; Kaneko T; Hasegawa R; Kurosu T; Koizumi W
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jul; 49(7):856-863. PubMed ID: 33885229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
