250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36984434)
1. Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal at the Apical One-Third of the Root Using Different Protocols of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser.
Habshi AY; Aga N; Habshi KY; Hassan MEM; Choudhry Z; Ahmed MA; Syed AUY; Jouhar R
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(3):. PubMed ID: 36984434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Effectiveness of Erbium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser, GentleWave Irradiation, Photodynamic Therapy, and Sodium Hypochlorite in Smear Layer Removal.
Dash S; Ismail PM; Singh J; Agwan MA; Ravikumar K; Annadurai T
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1266-1269. PubMed ID: 33850073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser.
Takeda FH; Harashima T; Kimura Y; Matsumoto K
Int Endod J; 1999 Jan; 32(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 10356467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet and diode lasers in smear layer removal and dentin permeability of root canal after biomechanical preparation - A scanning electron microscopy study.
Dhawan S; Jasuja P; Khurana H; Gakhar E; Singh H
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2020; 38(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 32174631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of the Erbium:Yttrium aluminum garnet PIPS technique in comparison to different chemical solutions in removing the endodontic smear layer-an in vitro profilometric study.
Nasher R; Franzen R; Gutknecht N
Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Dec; 31(9):1871-1882. PubMed ID: 27778116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antibacterial and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser Irradiation by Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming in Primary Molar Root Canals: A Preliminary Study.
Korkut E; Torlak E; Gezgin O; Özer H; Şener Y
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep; 36(9):480-486. PubMed ID: 29905503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Laser-Activated Irrigations on Smear Layer Removal from the Root Canal Wall.
Wang X; Cheng X; Liu B; Liu X; Yu Q; He W
Photomed Laser Surg; 2017 Dec; 35(12):688-694. PubMed ID: 28394240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser.
Peeters HH; Suardita K
J Endod; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1585-9. PubMed ID: 22000469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation in Comparison with Different Irrigation Systems for Cleaning the Apical Root Canal Area Beyond Ledge.
Aung NPS; Watanabe S; Okiji T
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg; 2021 Dec; 39(12):759-765. PubMed ID: 34788578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of laser-based irrigant activation methods in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities.
Deleu E; Meire MA; De Moor RJ
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Feb; 30(2):831-5. PubMed ID: 24091791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of laser-activated irrigation of 1320-nanometer Nd:YAG laser on sealer penetration in curved root canals.
Moon YM; Kim HC; Bae KS; Baek SH; Shon WJ; Lee W
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):531-5. PubMed ID: 22414844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser in removing smear layer and debris with two different output powers.
Bolhari B; Ehsani S; Etemadi A; Shafaq M; Nosrat A
Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 Oct; 32(10):527-32. PubMed ID: 25198390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Er:YAG 2,940-nm laser fiber in endodontic treatment: a help in removing smear layer.
Guidotti R; Merigo E; Fornaini C; Rocca JP; Medioni E; Vescovi P
Lasers Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 29(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23212445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of the effects of 5 irragant combinations on cleaning of anterior straight root canal walls].
Li C; DU R; Zhu YQ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Jun; 14(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15995780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of the erbium:YAG laser and new design radial and stripped tips in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
DiVito E; Peters OA; Olivi G
Lasers Med Sci; 2012 Mar; 27(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 21120568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An
Ismail PMS; AlMogbel AM; Priya R; Bansal N; Mattigatti S; Nara A; AlMutairi FJ
Ann Afr Med; 2022; 21(3):244-249. PubMed ID: 36204910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of oxidative potential water as a root canal irrigant.
Hata G; Hayami S; Weine FS; Toda T
Int Endod J; 2001 Jun; 34(4):308-17. PubMed ID: 11482143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
