These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36984435)

  • 21. Totally minimally invasive esophagectomy versus hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Workum F; Klarenbeek BR; Baranov N; Rovers MM; Rosman C
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 32350519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the MIRO Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nuytens F; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Gagnière J; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrère N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Markar SR; Piessen G;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Apr; 156(4):323-332. PubMed ID: 33595631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Introduction of laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy as hybrid procedure and comparison with open esophagectomy. A propensity-matched retrospective study.
    Spiliotis AE; Gäbelein G; Malinowski M; Holländer S; Scherber PR; Glanemann M
    Minerva Surg; 2022 Feb; 77(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 35315265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bras Harriott C; Angeramo CA; Casas MA; Schlottmann F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Dec; 164(6):e233-e254. PubMed ID: 35164948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Yang J; Chen L; Ge K; Yang JL
    World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2019 Nov; 11(11):1081-1091. PubMed ID: 31798787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
    Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Safe Transition from Open to Total Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer Utilizing Process Management Methodology.
    Bjelovic M; Gunjic D; Babic T; Veselinovic M; Djukanovic M; Potkonjak D; Milosavljevic V
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jul; 13(15):. PubMed ID: 39124631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
    Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis.
    Na KJ; Kang CH; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):841-848. PubMed ID: 34542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. FA01.01: MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH RESULTS IN BETTER OUTCOME COMPARED TO OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY-A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS.
    Kwan Kit Chan D; Siu Yin Chan F; King Hung Tong D; Yu Hong Wong I; Lai Yin Wong C; Ting Law T; Ying Kit Law S
    Dis Esophagus; 2018 Sep; 31(13):1. PubMed ID: 30219909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
    Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robot-Assisted Hybrid Esophagectomy Is Associated with a Shorter Length of Stay Compared to Conventional Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Study.
    Rolff HC; Ambrus RB; Belmouhand M; Achiam MP; Wegmann M; Siemsen M; Kofoed SC; Svendsen LB
    Minim Invasive Surg; 2017; 2017():6907896. PubMed ID: 29362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A retrospective study of preoperative malnutrition based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score as an associated marker for short-term outcomes after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3367-3375. PubMed ID: 35976434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study.
    Schoppmann SF; Prager G; Langer FB; Riegler FM; Kabon B; Fleischmann E; Zacherl J
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Dec; 24(12):3044-53. PubMed ID: 20464423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.