202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3698492)
21. Bone age assessment practices in infants and older children among Society for Pediatric Radiology members.
Breen MA; Tsai A; Stamm A; Kleinman PK
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Aug; 46(9):1269-74. PubMed ID: 27173981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The applicability of Greulich and Pyle atlas to assess skeletal age for four ethnic groups.
Mansourvar M; Ismail MA; Raj RG; Kareem SA; Aik S; Gunalan R; Antony CD
J Forensic Leg Med; 2014 Feb; 22():26-9. PubMed ID: 24485416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The reliability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas when applied to a modern Scottish population.
Hackman L; Black S
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jan; 58(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 23061975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The assessment of skeletal maturation.
Gilli G
Horm Res; 1996; 45 Suppl 2():49-52. PubMed ID: 8805044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-aided estimation of skeletal age and comparison with bone age evaluations by the method of Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse.
Frisch H; Riedl S; Waldhör T
Pediatr Radiol; 1996; 26(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 8599016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bone age assessment: Large-scale comparison of Greulich-Pyle method and Tanner-Whitehouse 3 method for Taiwanese children.
Yuh YS; Chou TY; Tung TH
J Chin Med Assoc; 2023 Feb; 86(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 36652571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today?
van Rijn RR; Lequin MH; Robben SG; Hop WC; van Kuijk C
Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Oct; 31(10):748-52. PubMed ID: 11685448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Age assessment by the Greulich and Pyle method compared to other skeletal X-ray and dental methods in data from Finnish child victims of the Southeast Asian Tsunami.
Varkkola O; Ranta H; Metsäniitty M; Sajantila A
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2011 Dec; 7(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 21337038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tanner-Whitehouse and Greulich-Pyle skeletal age velocity comparisons.
Fry EI
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1971 Nov; 35(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 4332703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Tanner-Whitehouse and Greulich-Pyle methods in a large scale Danish Survey.
Andersen E
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1971 Nov; 35(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 4332702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Computerized Bone Age Estimation Using Deep Learning Based Program: Evaluation of the Accuracy and Efficiency.
Kim JR; Shim WH; Yoon HM; Hong SH; Lee JS; Cho YA; Kim S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1374-1380. PubMed ID: 28898126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reproducibility of bone ages when performed by radiology registrars: an audit of Tanner and Whitehouse II versus Greulich and Pyle methods.
King DG; Steventon DM; O'Sullivan MP; Cook AM; Hornsby VP; Jefferson IG; King PR
Br J Radiol; 1994 Sep; 67(801):848-51. PubMed ID: 7953224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Determination of skeletal age in children of Western Germany with normal and abnormal growth development].
Kemperdick HF
Fortschr Med; 1981 Feb; 99(5):152-6. PubMed ID: 7274957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is the assessment of bone age by the Greulich-Pyle method reliable at forensic age estimation for Turkish children?
Büken B; Safak AA; Yazici B; Büken E; Mayda AS
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Dec; 173(2-3):146-53. PubMed ID: 17391883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to black and white children of today.
Loder RT; Estle DT; Morrison K; Eggleston D; Fish DN; Greenfield ML; Guire KE
Am J Dis Child; 1993 Dec; 147(12):1329-33. PubMed ID: 8249956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The reliability of bone age determination in central European children using the Greulich and Pyle method.
Groell R; Lindbichler F; Riepl T; Gherra L; Roposch A; Fotter R
Br J Radiol; 1999 May; 72(857):461-4. PubMed ID: 10505010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Forensic use of the Greulich and Pyle atlas: prediction intervals and relevance.
Chaumoitre K; Saliba-Serre B; Adalian P; Signoli M; Leonetti G; Panuel M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1032-1043. PubMed ID: 27357132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of skeletal maturity assessed by radiological and ultrasonic methods.
Utczas K; Muzsnai A; Cameron N; Zsakai A; Bodzsar EB
Am J Hum Biol; 2017 Jul; 29(4):. PubMed ID: 28094893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method.
Booz C; Yel I; Wichmann JL; Boettger S; Al Kamali A; Albrecht MH; Martin SS; Lenga L; Huizinga NA; D'Angelo T; Cavallaro M; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Jan; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 31993795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tanner-Whitehouse versus Greulich-Pyle in bone age determinations.
Oestreich AE
J Pediatr; 1997 Jul; 131(1 Pt 1):5-6. PubMed ID: 9255181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
