202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3698492)
41. Applicability and robustness of an artificial intelligence-based assessment for Greulich and Pyle bone age in a German cohort.
Pape J; Hirsch FW; Deffaa OJ; DiFranco MD; Rosolowski M; Gräfe D
Rofo; 2024 Jun; 196(6):600-606. PubMed ID: 38065542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Can the Greulich and Pyle method be used on French contemporary individuals?
Zabet D; Rérolle C; Pucheux J; Telmon N; Saint-Martin P
Int J Legal Med; 2015 Jan; 129(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 24898190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Simplified radius, ulna, and short bone-age assessment procedure using grouped-Tanner-Whitehouse method.
Hsieh CW; Liu TC; Wang JK; Jong TL; Tiu CM
Pediatr Int; 2011 Aug; 53(4):567-75. PubMed ID: 21486377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Does mirror imaging a radiograph affect reliability of age assessment using the Greulich and Pyle atlas?
Hackman L; Black S
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Sep; 57(5):1276-80. PubMed ID: 22509947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Automatic Determination of the Greulich-Pyle Bone Age as an Alternative Approach for Chinese Children with Discordant Bone Age.
Zhang J; Lin F; Ding X
Horm Res Paediatr; 2016; 86(2):83-89. PubMed ID: 27414678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. FELS, Greulich-Pyle, and Tanner-Whitehouse bone age assessments in a group of Italian children and adolescents.
Vignolo M; Milani S; Cerbello G; Coroli P; Di Battista E; Aicardi G
Am J Hum Biol; 1992; 4(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 28524393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Determination of skeletal age : comparison of the methods of Greulich and Pyle and Tanner and Whitehouse].
Horter MJ; Friesen S; Wacker S; Vogt B; Leidiger B; Roedl R; Schiedel F
Orthopade; 2012 Dec; 41(12):966-76. PubMed ID: 23179264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparative study of Greulich and Pyle Atlas and Maturos 4.0 program for age estimation in a Portuguese sample.
Santos C; Ferreira M; Alves FC; Cunha E
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):276.e1-7. PubMed ID: 21816552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Applicability of Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to Indian children.
Patil ST; Parchand MP; Meshram MM; Kamdi NY
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):200.e1-4. PubMed ID: 22014975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Maturation Disparity between Hand-Wrist Bones in a Chinese Sample of Normal Children: An Analysis Based on Automatic BoneXpert and Manual Greulich and Pyle Atlas Assessment.
Zhang J; Lin F; Ding X
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 27134531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. An appraisal of Greulich-Pyle Atlas for skeletal age assessment in Pakistan.
Zafar AM; Nadeem N; Husen Y; Ahmad MN
J Pak Med Assoc; 2010 Jul; 60(7):552-5. PubMed ID: 20578605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Racial differences in growth patterns of children assessed on the basis of bone age.
Zhang A; Sayre JW; Vachon L; Liu BJ; Huang HK
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):228-35. PubMed ID: 18955510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Reproducibility and inter-observer agreement of Greulich-Pyle protocol to estimate skeletal age among female adolescent soccer players.
Faustino-da-Silva YV; Martinho DV; Coelho-E-Silva MJ; Valente-Dos-Santos J; Conde J; Oliveira TG; Ronque ERV; Agostinete RR; Fernandes RA; Sherar LB
BMC Pediatr; 2020 Oct; 20(1):494. PubMed ID: 33106161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Infant bone age estimation based on fibular shaft length: model development and clinical validation.
Tsai A; Stamoulis C; Bixby SD; Breen MA; Connolly SA; Kleinman PK
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Mar; 46(3):342-56. PubMed ID: 26637315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Applicability of two commonly used bone age assessment methods to twenty-first century UK children.
Alshamrani K; Offiah AC
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):504-513. PubMed ID: 31372785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Hand MRI and the Greulich-Pyle atlas in skeletal age estimation in adolescents.
Hojreh A; Gamper J; Schmook MT; Weber M; Prayer D; Herold CJ; Noebauer-Huhmann IM
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(7):963-971. PubMed ID: 29372277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Skeletal age estimation for forensic purposes: A comparison of GP, TW2 and TW3 methods on an Italian sample.
Pinchi V; De Luca F; Ricciardi F; Focardi M; Piredda V; Mazzeo E; Norelli GA
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():83-90. PubMed ID: 24681971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Applicability of Greulich and Pyle and Demirijan aging methods to a sample of Italian population.
Santoro V; Roca R; De Donno A; Fiandaca C; Pinto G; Tafuri S; Introna F
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):153.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22565117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images.
Spampinato C; Palazzo S; Giordano D; Aldinucci M; Leonardi R
Med Image Anal; 2017 Feb; 36():41-51. PubMed ID: 27816861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Age assessment using the Greulich and Pyle method on a heterogeneous sample of 300 Italian healthy and pathologic subjects.
De Donno A; Santoro V; Lubelli S; Marrone M; Lozito P; Introna F
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jun; 229(1-3):157.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23570965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
