407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36985738)
1. Rheology as a Tool for Fine-Tuning the Properties of Printable Bioinspired Gels.
Bercea M
Molecules; 2023 Mar; 28(6):. PubMed ID: 36985738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.
Paxton N; Smolan W; Böck T; Melchels F; Groll J; Jungst T
Biofabrication; 2017 Nov; 9(4):044107. PubMed ID: 28930091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-Fidelity Extrusion Bioprinting of Low-Printability Polymers Using Carbopol as a Rheology Modifier.
Barreiro Carpio M; Gonzalez Martinez E; Dabaghi M; Ungureanu J; Arizpe Tafoya AV; Gonzalez Martinez DA; Hirota JA; Moran-Mirabal JM
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 Nov; 15(47):54234-54248. PubMed ID: 37964517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioinspired Processing: Complex Coacervates as Versatile Inks for 3D Bioprinting.
Khoonkari M; Es Sayed J; Oggioni M; Amirsadeghi A; Dijkstra P; Parisi D; Kruyt F; van Rijn P; Włodarczyk-Biegun MK; Kamperman M
Adv Mater; 2023 Jul; 35(28):e2210769. PubMed ID: 36916861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioinspired 3D printable pectin-nanocellulose ink formulations.
Cernencu AI; Lungu A; Stancu IC; Serafim A; Heggset E; Syverud K; Iovu H
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Sep; 220():12-21. PubMed ID: 31196530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A rheological approach to assess the printability of thermosensitive chitosan-based biomaterial inks.
Rahimnejad M; Labonté-Dupuis T; Demarquette NR; Lerouge S
Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 16(1):015003. PubMed ID: 33245047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Processing Parameters of 3D Bioprinting on the Cellular Activity of Bioinks.
Adhikari J; Roy A; Das A; Ghosh M; Thomas S; Sinha A; Kim J; Saha P
Macromol Biosci; 2021 Jan; 21(1):e2000179. PubMed ID: 33017096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting.
Kiyotake EA; Douglas AW; Thomas EE; Nimmo SL; Detamore MS
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():176-187. PubMed ID: 30669003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hydrogel Bioink Reinforcement for Additive Manufacturing: A Focused Review of Emerging Strategies.
Chimene D; Kaunas R; Gaharwar AK
Adv Mater; 2020 Jan; 32(1):e1902026. PubMed ID: 31599073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gallol-derived ECM-mimetic adhesive bioinks exhibiting temporal shear-thinning and stabilization behavior.
Shin M; Galarraga JH; Kwon MY; Lee H; Burdick JA
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():165-175. PubMed ID: 30366132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shear-Thinning and Thermo-Reversible Nanoengineered Inks for 3D Bioprinting.
Wilson SA; Cross LM; Peak CW; Gaharwar AK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Dec; 9(50):43449-43458. PubMed ID: 29214803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A bioink blend for rotary 3D bioprinting tissue engineered small-diameter vascular constructs.
Freeman S; Ramos R; Alexis Chando P; Zhou L; Reeser K; Jin S; Soman P; Ye K
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():152-164. PubMed ID: 31271883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Manufacturing of self-standing multi-layered 3D-bioprinted alginate-hyaluronate constructs by controlling the cross-linking mechanisms for tissue engineering applications.
Janarthanan G; Kim JH; Kim I; Lee C; Chung EJ; Noh I
Biofabrication; 2022 May; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35504259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Photo-crosslinkable methacrylated konjac glucomannan (KGMMA) hydrogels as a promising bioink for 3D bioprinting.
Qin Z; Pang Y; Lu C; Yang Y; Gao M; Zheng L; Zhao J
Biomater Sci; 2022 Nov; 10(22):6549-6557. PubMed ID: 36205771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-Dimensional-Printable Thermo/Photo-Cross-Linked Methacrylated Chitosan-Gelatin Hydrogel Composites for Tissue Engineering.
Osi AR; Zhang H; Chen J; Zhou Y; Wang R; Fu J; Müller-Buschbaum P; Zhong Q
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2021 May; 13(19):22902-22913. PubMed ID: 33960765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-decellularized printing of cartilage extracellular matrix: distinction between biomaterial ink and bioink.
Mokhtarinia K; Masaeli E
Biomater Sci; 2023 Mar; 11(7):2317-2329. PubMed ID: 36751955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.
Heid S; Boccaccini AR
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 113():1-22. PubMed ID: 32622053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.
Marques CF; Diogo GS; Pina S; Oliveira JM; Silva TH; Reis RL
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2019 Mar; 30(3):32. PubMed ID: 30840132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Embedded bioprinting for designer 3D tissue constructs with complex structural organization.
Zeng X; Meng Z; He J; Mao M; Li X; Chen P; Fan J; Li D
Acta Biomater; 2022 Mar; 140():1-22. PubMed ID: 34875360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multimaterial bioink method for 3D printing tunable, cell-compatible hydrogels.
Rutz AL; Hyland KE; Jakus AE; Burghardt WR; Shah RN
Adv Mater; 2015 Mar; 27(9):1607-14. PubMed ID: 25641220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
