These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36987512)

  • 41. Extraversion and behavioural approach system in stimulus analysis and motor response initiation.
    De Pascalis V; Sommer K; Scacchia P
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Sep; 137():91-106. PubMed ID: 30012464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United Kingdom: A personality-based perspective on concerns and intention to self-isolate.
    Bacon AM; Corr PJ
    Br J Health Psychol; 2020 Nov; 25(4):839-848. PubMed ID: 32348015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Young females' attention toward road safety images: An ERP study of the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory.
    Kaye SA; White MJ; Lewis I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 28837359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of trait behavioral inhibition and behavioral approach motivation systems on the LPP and frontal asymmetry to anger pictures.
    Gable PA; Poole BD
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Feb; 9(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 23175676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Underlying differences in resting-state activity metrics related to sensitivity to punishment.
    Adrián-Ventura J; Fabregat-Nabás J; Costumero V; Ávila C
    Behav Brain Res; 2023 Feb; 437():114152. PubMed ID: 36228781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Individual differences in cognitive reappraisal: experiential and physiological responses to an anger provocation.
    Mauss IB; Cook CL; Cheng JY; Gross JJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Nov; 66(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 17543404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Construct validity of questionnaires for the original and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory.
    Leue A; Reuter M; Corr PJ; Ettinger U
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1026894. PubMed ID: 36478928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. It's worth the trouble: Stressor exposure is related to increased cognitive reappraisal ability.
    Zeier P; Meine LE; Wessa M
    Stress Health; 2022 Aug; 38(3):602-609. PubMed ID: 34623727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Locus of Control as a Mediator of the Relationships Between Motivational Systems and Trait Anxiety.
    Kaynak H; Turan A; Demir Y
    Psychol Rep; 2024 Aug; 127(4):1533-1560. PubMed ID: 36377649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. When there's a will, there's a way: Disentangling the effects of goals and means in emotion regulation.
    Tamir M; Halperin E; Porat R; Bigman YE; Hasson Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 May; 116(5):795-816. PubMed ID: 30614729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Approaching anger in schizophrenia: What an implicit task tells you that self-report does not.
    Reddy LF; Green MF; Wynn JK; Rinck M; Horan WP
    Schizophr Res; 2016 Oct; 176(2-3):514-519. PubMed ID: 27242068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The interplay between parental care and OPRM1 in reward responsiveness.
    Wang Q; Yang Y; Yu R; Zhao W; Wang M; Wang Y; Guo W; He L; Gong P
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2022 Sep; 143():105845. PubMed ID: 35779341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparing the affective and social effects of positive reappraisal and minimising reappraisal.
    Zhao Y; Waugh CE; Kammrath L; Wang Q
    Cogn Emot; 2022 May; 36(3):433-451. PubMed ID: 34895053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. This time it's personal: reappraisal after acquired brain injury.
    Rowlands L; Coetzer R; Turnbull O
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Mar; 35(2):305-323. PubMed ID: 33153409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Regulating Anger under Stress via Cognitive Reappraisal and Sadness.
    Zhan J; Wu X; Fan J; Guo J; Zhou J; Ren J; Liu C; Luo J
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1372. PubMed ID: 28855881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory.
    Leue A; Chavanon ML; Wacker J; Stemmler G
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 19674394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Contrasting Regulatory Focus and Reinforcement Sensitivity: A Daily Diary Study of Goal Pursuit and Emotion.
    Eddington KM; Majestic C; Silvia PJ
    Pers Individ Dif; 2012 Aug; 53(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 22736878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Behavioral approach and avoidance in schizophrenia: an evaluation of motivational profiles.
    Felice Reddy L; Green MF; Rizzo S; Sugar CA; Blanchard JJ; Gur RE; Kring AM; Horan WP
    Schizophr Res; 2014 Oct; 159(1):164-70. PubMed ID: 25153364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Distinguishing between learning and motivation in behavioral tests of the reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality.
    Smillie LD; Dalgleish LI; Jackson CJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):476-89. PubMed ID: 17363762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Emotion regulation strategies and aggression in youngsters: The mediating role of negative affect.
    Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Megías-Robles A; Gómez-Leal R; Cabello R; Fernández-Berrocal P
    Heliyon; 2023 Mar; 9(3):e14048. PubMed ID: 36925539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.