These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36988723)
1. Cost-effectiveness comparison of minimally invasive, robotic and open approaches in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Chok AY; Zhao Y; Tan IE; Au MKH; Tan EJKW Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Mar; 38(1):86. PubMed ID: 36988723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the economic efficiency of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis. Koh YX; Zhao Y; Tan IE; Tan HL; Chua DW; Loh WL; Tan EK; Teo JY; Au MKH; Goh BKP Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3035-3051. PubMed ID: 38777892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Koh YX; Zhao Y; Tan IE; Tan HL; Chua DW; Loh WL; Tan EK; Teo JY; Au MKH; Goh BKP Surgery; 2024 Jul; 176(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 38782702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Open and Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Heger P; Probst P; Hüttner FJ; Gooßen K; Proctor T; Müller-Stich BP; Strobel O; Büchler MW; Diener MK World J Surg; 2017 Nov; 41(11):2746-2757. PubMed ID: 28634842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis. Seow W; Dudi-Venkata NN; Bedrikovetski S; Kroon HM; Sammour T Tech Coloproctol; 2023 May; 27(5):345-360. PubMed ID: 36508067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery. Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical approach for rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches. Ryan OK; Ryan ÉJ; Creavin B; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Petrelli F; Bonitta G; Kennelly R; Hanly A; Martin ST; Winter DC Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 33280950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pulmonary lobectomy for cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic approach. Aiolfi A; Nosotti M; Micheletto G; Khor D; Bonitta G; Perali C; Marin J; Biraghi T; Bona D Surgery; 2021 Feb; 169(2):436-446. PubMed ID: 33097244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Kowalewski KF; Wieland VLS; Kriegmair MC; Uysal D; Sicker T; Stolzenburg JU; Michel MS; Haney CM Eur Urol Focus; 2023 May; 9(3):480-490. PubMed ID: 36529645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery for gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Chee MYM; Wu AGR; Fong KY; Yew A; Koh YX; Goh BKP Surg Endosc; 2024 Sep; 38(9):4846-4857. PubMed ID: 39148006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical outcomes and cost analysis of a multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery caseload in the Australian public health system. Steffens D; McBride KE; Hirst N; Solomon MJ; Anderson T; Thanigasalam R; Leslie S; Karunaratne S; Bannon PG J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2237-2245. PubMed ID: 37289337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing outcomes in colorectal surgery: cost and clinical analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches to colon resection. Hancock KJ; Klimberg VS; Nunez-Lopez O; Gajjar AH; Gomez G; Tyler DS; Rashidi L J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):107-112. PubMed ID: 33634355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Murray A; Lourenco T; de Verteuil R; Hernandez R; Fraser C; McKinley A; Krukowski Z; Vale L; Grant A Health Technol Assess; 2006 Nov; 10(45):1-141, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17083853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, and robotic distal gastrectomy for early and locally advanced gastric cancer. Aiolfi A; Lombardo F; Matsushima K; Sozzi A; Cavalli M; Panizzo V; Bonitta G; Bona D Surgery; 2021 Sep; 170(3):942-951. PubMed ID: 34023140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis: Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Three Surgery Procedures Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer. Wang L; Zhang Z; Gong L; Zhan Y; Li M; Li S; Xiao Y J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 May; 29(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 30648922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]