These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36988982)

  • 1. Geographic diffusion of digital mammography in the United States.
    Wiese D; Stroup AM; Islami F; Mattes M; Baylor E; Boscoe FP; Henry KA
    Cancer; 2023 Jul; 129(14):2144-2151. PubMed ID: 36988982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in geographic accessibility to mammography by state and rural-urban status, United States, 2006-2022.
    Wiese D; Islami F; Henry KA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2023 Mar; 115(3):337-340. PubMed ID: 36515214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A catchment and location-allocation analysis of mammography access in Delaware, US: implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening.
    Webster JL; Goldstein ND; Rowland JP; Tuite CM; Siegel SD
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Nov; 25(1):137. PubMed ID: 37941020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).
    Celaya MO; Berke EM; Onega TL; Gui J; Riddle BL; Cherala SS; Rees JR
    Rural Remote Health; 2010; 10(2):1361. PubMed ID: 20438282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening.
    Jewett PI; Gangnon RE; Elkin E; Hampton JM; Jacobs EA; Malecki K; LaGro J; Newcomb PA; Trentham-Dietz A
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):65-71.e2. PubMed ID: 29439783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geographic access to critical care obstetrics for women of reproductive age by race and ethnicity.
    Kroelinger CD; Brantley MD; Fuller TR; Okoroh EM; Monsour MJ; Cox S; Barfield WD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):304.e1-304.e11. PubMed ID: 32835715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Breast Cancer Screening: A Spatial Clustering Analysis.
    Chandak A; Nayar P; Lin G
    J Rural Health; 2019 Mar; 35(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 29888497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in the availability of screening mammography, 2000-2010.
    Elkin EB; Atoria CL; Leoce N; Bach PB; Schrag D
    Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(21):3847-53. PubMed ID: 23943323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visualizing the Diffusion of Digital Mammography in New York State.
    Boscoe FP; Zhang X
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Apr; 26(4):490-494. PubMed ID: 28154106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Geographic access to breast imaging for US women.
    Onega T; Hubbard R; Hill D; Lee CI; Haas JS; Carlos HA; Alford-Teaster J; Bogart A; DeMartini WB; Kerlikowske K; Virnig BA; Buist DS; Henderson L; Tosteson AN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):874-82. PubMed ID: 24889479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST.
    Pisano ED; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Cormack JB; Hanna LA; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett LW; D'Orsi CJ; Jong RA; Rebner M; Tosteson AN; Gatsonis CA;
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 18227537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.
    Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Lehman CD; Taplin SH; Sickles EA;
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):493-502. PubMed ID: 22007043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002.
    Coughlin SS; Leadbetter S; Richards T; Sabatino SA
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Jan; 66(2):260-75. PubMed ID: 18022299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis: is travel time important?
    Henry KA; Boscoe FP; Johnson CJ; Goldberg DW; Sherman R; Cockburn M
    J Community Health; 2011 Dec; 36(6):933-42. PubMed ID: 21461957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
    Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do mobile units contribute to spatial accessibility to mammography for uninsured women?
    Hughes AE; Lee SC; Eberth JM; Berry E; Pruitt SL
    Prev Med; 2020 Sep; 138():106156. PubMed ID: 32473958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines.
    Henry KA; McDonald K; Sherman R; Kinney AY; Stroup AM
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 Aug; 23(8):664-74. PubMed ID: 24865409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.