These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36989873)

  • 1. Debonding of coin-shaped osseointegrated implants: Coupling of experimental and numerical approaches.
    Hériveaux Y; Le Cann S; Immel K; Vennat E; Nguyen VH; Brailovski V; Karasinski P; Sauer RA; Haïat G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 May; 141():105787. PubMed ID: 36989873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A modified Coulomb's law for the tangential debonding of osseointegrated implants.
    Immel K; Duong TX; Nguyen VH; Haïat G; Sauer RA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Jun; 19(3):1091-1108. PubMed ID: 31916014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the debonding process of osseointegrated implants due to coupled adhesion and friction.
    Immel K; Nguyen VH; Haïat G; Sauer RA
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2023 Feb; 22(1):133-158. PubMed ID: 36284076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mode III cleavage of a coin-shaped titanium implant in bone: effect of friction and crack propagation.
    Mathieu V; Vayron R; Barthel E; Dalmas D; Soffer E; Anagnostou F; Haiat G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Apr; 8():194-203. PubMed ID: 22402166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface.
    Raffa ML; Nguyen VH; Haiat G
    Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Dec; 18(1):114. PubMed ID: 31796076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the dynamic behaviour of bone anchored hearing aids using a finite element model and its applications to implant stability assessment.
    Mohamed M; Westover L
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 Oct; 60(10):2779-2795. PubMed ID: 35857252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Osseointegrated Implants Placed in Bone of Different Densities With Cemented Fixed Prosthetic Restoration.
    Chidambaravalli K; Krishnan V
    J Oral Implantol; 2020 Oct; 46(5):480-490. PubMed ID: 32315437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasonic Evaluation of the Bone-Implant Interface.
    Hériveaux Y; Nguyen VH; Haïat G
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1364():373-396. PubMed ID: 35508884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of stress induced by different lengths of osseointegrated implants in the anterior maxilla.
    Lee JS; Lim YJ
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(11):1143-9. PubMed ID: 22397684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new interface element with progressive damage and osseointegration for modeling of interfaces in hip resurfacing.
    Caouette C; Bureau MN; Lavigne M; Vendittoli PA; Nuño N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Mar; 227(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 23662336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation in a dental implant for biomechanical stability assessment.
    Vayron R; Nguyen VH; Bosc R; Naili S; Haïat G
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Oct; 14(5):1021-32. PubMed ID: 25619479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytical modeling of the interaction of an ultrasonic wave with a rough bone-implant interface.
    Hériveaux Y; Nguyen VH; Biwa S; Haïat G
    Ultrasonics; 2020 Dec; 108():106223. PubMed ID: 32771811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stress shielding at the bone-implant interface: Influence of surface roughness and of the bone-implant contact ratio.
    Raffa ML; Nguyen VH; Hernigou P; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH; Haiat G
    J Orthop Res; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1174-1183. PubMed ID: 32852064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the coefficient of friction and tightening speed on the preload induced at the dental implant complex with the finite element method.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Geramipanah F; Safari H; Paknejad M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 25749081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study and characterization of the crest module design: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Costa C; Peixinho N; Silva JP; Carvalho S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 25794909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic assessment of osseointegration phenomena at the bone-implant interface using convolutional neural network.
    Kwak Y; Nguyen VH; Hériveaux Y; Belanger P; Park J; Haïat G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jun; 149(6):4337. PubMed ID: 34241416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part II: biomechanical integrity at bone-implant interface.
    Shibata Y; Tanimoto Y; Maruyama N; Nagakura M
    J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Apr; 59(2):84-95. PubMed ID: 25797023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of implant thread design on stress distribution in anisotropic bone with different osseointegration conditions: a finite element analysis.
    Mosavar A; Ziaei A; Kadkhodaei M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1317-26. PubMed ID: 26478976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing.
    Halldin A; Ander M; Jacobsson M; Hansson S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 May; 14():45. PubMed ID: 25994839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.