These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36989962)

  • 1. Constructing the behavioral sequence of the takeover process-TOR, behavior characteristics and phases division: A real vehicle experiment.
    Yu Z; Xu G; Jiang K; Feng Z; Xu S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107040. PubMed ID: 36989962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of different takeover request interfaces on takeover behavior and performance during conditionally automated driving.
    Ou YK; Huang WX; Fang CW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106425. PubMed ID: 34601181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.
    Roche F; Somieski A; Brandenburg S
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):839-849. PubMed ID: 30517032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of takeover request lead time on drivers' situation awareness for manually exiting from freeways: A web-based study on level 3 automated vehicles.
    Tan X; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Apr; 168():106593. PubMed ID: 35180465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving.
    Peng H; Chen F; Chen P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does a faster takeover necessarily mean it is better? A study on the influence of urgency and takeover-request lead time on takeover performance and safety.
    Wu H; Wu C; Lyu N; Li J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106647. PubMed ID: 35427908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.
    McDonald AD; Alambeigi H; Engström J; Markkula G; Vogelpohl T; Dunne J; Yuma N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):642-688. PubMed ID: 30830804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting driver takeover performance in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Zhou F; Pulver EM; Tilbury DM; Robert LP; Pradhan AK; Yang XJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105748. PubMed ID: 33099127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of unreliable automation, non-driving related task, and takeover time budget on drivers' takeover performance and workload.
    Shahini F; Park J; Welch K; Zahabi M
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):182-197. PubMed ID: 35451915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
    Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sleep in highly automated driving: Takeover performance after waking up.
    Wörle J; Metz B; Othersen I; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105617. PubMed ID: 32540623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Olfactory Facilitation of Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
    Tang Q; Guo G; Zhang Z; Zhang B; Wu Y
    Hum Factors; 2021 Jun; 63(4):553-564. PubMed ID: 31999480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Takeover requests for automated driving: The effects of signal direction, lead time, and modality on takeover performance.
    Huang G; Pitts BJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106534. PubMed ID: 34922107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysiological responses to takeover requests in conditionally automated driving.
    Du N; Yang XJ; Zhou F
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105804. PubMed ID: 33128991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of duration of monitoring before takeover request on takeover time with insights into eye tracking data.
    Huang C; Yang B; Nakano K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 185():107018. PubMed ID: 36924623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Takeover Performance During Conditionally Automated Driving.
    Weaver BW; DeLucia PR
    Hum Factors; 2022 Nov; 64(7):1227-1260. PubMed ID: 33307821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving.
    Wandtner B; Schömig N; Schmidt G
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):870-881. PubMed ID: 29617161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.