These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence]. Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year. Lo TS; Tan YL; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Wu PY; Al-Kharabsheh A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25017520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs. Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies. Zhu Q; Shu H; Du G; Dai Z Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():40-43. PubMed ID: 29455045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between vaginal colposuspension and transvaginal mesh. Lamblin G; Van-Nieuwenhuyse A; Chabert P; Lebail-Carval K; Moret S; Mellier G Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jul; 25(7):961-70. PubMed ID: 24573358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair. Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 231(2):263.e1-263.e10. PubMed ID: 38710269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative POPQ versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair at the Time of Transvaginal Apical Suspension (PREPARE trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Jeon MJ; Kim CH; Cho HH; Suh DH; Kim SR BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e034170. PubMed ID: 31911524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion. Achermann APP; Brazão ÉS; Riccetto CLZ; Palma PCR Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):856-857. PubMed ID: 30735341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study). Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence and surgical outcomes of stage 3 and 4 pelvic organs prolapse in Jimma university medical center, south west Ethiopia. Sori DA; Bretones S; Mellier G; de Rochambeau B BMC Womens Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):410. PubMed ID: 36207709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study. Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension]. Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel bilateral anterior sacrospinous hysteropexy technique for apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via the vaginal route: a cohort study. Naumann G; Börner C; Naumann LJ; Schröder S; Hüsch T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jul; 306(1):141-149. PubMed ID: 35288760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse? Li C; Shu H; Dai Z J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):438-445. PubMed ID: 30574821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women. Geoffrion R; Larouche M J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]