These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36991683)

  • 1. Empirical Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle's LiDAR Detection Performance Degradation for Actual Road Driving in Rain and Fog.
    Kim J; Park BJ; Kim J
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D Object Detection with SLS-Fusion Network in Foggy Weather Conditions.
    Mai NAM; Duthon P; Khoudour L; Crouzil A; Velastin SA
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(20):. PubMed ID: 34695925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of Mobile LiDAR in Real Road Driving Conditions.
    Kim J; Park BJ; Roh CG; Kim Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 34833537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laser and LIDAR in a System for Visibility Distance Estimation in Fog Conditions.
    Miclea RC; Dughir C; Alexa F; Sandru F; Silea I
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(21):. PubMed ID: 33167586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Survey on Ground Segmentation Methods for Automotive LiDAR Sensors.
    Gomes T; Matias D; Campos A; Cunha L; Roriz R
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weather Classification Using an Automotive LIDAR Sensor Based on Detections on Asphalt and Atmosphere.
    Vargas Rivero JR; Gerbich T; Teiluf V; Buschardt B; Chen J
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 32752297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D object detection through fog and occlusion: passive integral imaging vs active (LiDAR) sensing.
    Usmani K; O'Connor T; Wani P; Javidi B
    Opt Express; 2023 Jan; 31(1):479-491. PubMed ID: 36606982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Perception System of Intelligent Ground Vehicles in All Weather Conditions: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Mohammed AS; Amamou A; Ayevide FK; Kelouwani S; Agbossou K; Zioui N
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(22):. PubMed ID: 33203155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring the Influence of Environmental Conditions on Automotive Lidar Sensors.
    Linnhoff C; Hofrichter K; Elster L; Rosenberger P; Winner H
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 35890948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of Thermal Imaging Performance under Extreme Foggy Conditions: Applications to Autonomous Driving.
    Rivera Velázquez JM; Khoudour L; Saint Pierre G; Duthon P; Liandrat S; Bernardin F; Fiss S; Ivanov I; Peleg R
    J Imaging; 2022 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 36354879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Temperature Modify the Effects of Rain and Snow Precipitation on Road Traffic Injuries?
    Lee WK; Lee HA; Hwang SS; Kim H; Lim YH; Hong YC; Ha EH; Park H
    J Epidemiol; 2015; 25(8):544-52. PubMed ID: 26073021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fatal crashes involving large numbers of vehicles and weather.
    Wang Y; Liang L; Evans L
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():1-7. PubMed ID: 29203004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the performance of a polarized LiDAR imager in fog.
    Ballesta-Garcia M; Peña-Gutiérrez S; Rodríguez-Aramendía A; García-Gómez P; Rodrigo N; Bobi AR; Royo S
    Opt Express; 2022 Nov; 30(23):41524-41540. PubMed ID: 36366628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions.
    Brooks JO; Crisler MC; Klein N; Goodenough R; Beeco RW; Guirl C; Tyler PJ; Hilpert A; Miller Y; Grygier J; Burroughs B; Martin A; Ray R; Palmer C; Beck C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):698-705. PubMed ID: 21376857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Automotive LiDAR Performance Test Method in Dynamic Driving Conditions.
    Park J; Cho J; Lee S; Bak S; Kim Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance Analysis of NDT-based Graph SLAM for Autonomous Vehicle in Diverse Typical Driving Scenarios of Hong Kong.
    Wen W; Hsu LT; Zhang G
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30441784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of cooperative systems on driver behavior in heavy fog condition based on a driving simulator.
    Chang X; Li H; Qin L; Rong J; Lu Y; Chen X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():197-205. PubMed ID: 31054492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scan Line Based Road Marking Extraction from Mobile LiDAR Point Clouds.
    Yan L; Liu H; Tan J; Li Z; Xie H; Chen C
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jun; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 27322279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy-Power Controllable LiDAR Sensor System with 3D Object Recognition for Autonomous Vehicle.
    Lee S; Lee D; Choi P; Park D
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 33036476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of weather conditions, light conditions, and road lighting on vehicle speed.
    Jägerbrand AK; Sjöbergh J
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():505. PubMed ID: 27186469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.