These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36992891)

  • 1. Interactive robots for health in Europe: Technology readiness and adoption potential.
    Östlund B; Malvezzi M; Frennert S; Funk M; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Baur K; Alimisis D; Thorsteinsson F; Alonso-Cepeda A; Fau G; Haufe F; Di Pardo M; Moreno JC
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():979225. PubMed ID: 36992891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: an empirical investigation.
    Alaiad A; Zhou L
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Nov; 83(11):825-40. PubMed ID: 25132284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hopes and fears regarding care robots: Content analysis of newspapers in East Asia and Western Europe, 2001-2020.
    Kodate N; Maeda Y; Hauray B; Tsujimura M; Chan WCH; Mannan H; Yu W; Dalgalarrondo S; Cheung MC; Yumoto A; Suwa S; Donnelly S; Sakata N; O'Shea D; Obayashi K; Masuyama S
    Front Rehabil Sci; 2022; 3():1019089. PubMed ID: 36569638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying Features that Enhance Older Adults' Acceptance of Robots: A Mixed Methods Study.
    Chu L; Chen HW; Cheng PY; Ho P; Weng IT; Yang PL; Chien SE; Tu YC; Yang CC; Wang TM; Fung HH; Yeh SL
    Gerontology; 2019; 65(4):441-450. PubMed ID: 30844813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Increasing Centrality of Robotic Technology in the Context of Nursing Care: Bioethical Implications Analyzed through a Scoping Review Approach.
    Gibelli F; Ricci G; Sirignano A; Turrina S; De Leo D
    J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():1478025. PubMed ID: 34493953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heterogeneity of Attitudes toward Robots in Healthcare among the Chinese Public: A Latent Profile Analysis.
    Bi X; Gao Y; Sun E; Yan Y; Zhou Y; Ye X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Realizing the Potential of Robotics for Aged Care Through Co-Creation.
    Robillard JM; Kabacińska K
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2020; 76(2):461-466. PubMed ID: 32568203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot.
    Broadbent E; Kuo IH; Lee YI; Rabindran J; Kerse N; Stafford R; MacDonald BA
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Jun; 16(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 20575729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significant challenges when introducing care robots in Swedish elder care.
    Johansson-Pajala RM; Gustafsson C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2022 Feb; 17(2):166-176. PubMed ID: 32538206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. User Experience in Social Robots.
    Shourmasti ES; Colomo-Palacios R; Holone H; Demi S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(15):. PubMed ID: 34372289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The adoption of care robots in home care-A survey on the attitudes of Finnish home care personnel.
    Rantanen T; Lehto P; Vuorinen P; Coco K
    J Clin Nurs; 2018 May; 27(9-10):1846-1859. PubMed ID: 29575204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot applications for autism: a comprehensive review.
    Saleh MA; Hanapiah FA; Hashim H
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Aug; 16(6):580-602. PubMed ID: 32706602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop.
    Busse TS; Kernebeck S; Nef L; Rebacz P; Kickbusch I; Ehlers JP
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Nov; 23(11):e20046. PubMed ID: 34757318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Healthcare Workers' Point of View on Medical Robotics During COVID-19 Pandemic - A Scoping Review.
    Defi IR; Iskandar S; Charismawati S; Turnip A; Novita D
    Int J Gen Med; 2022; 15():3767-3777. PubMed ID: 35418776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study.
    Cavallo F; Esposito R; Limosani R; Manzi A; Bevilacqua R; Felici E; Di Nuovo A; Cangelosi A; Lattanzio F; Dario P
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Sep; 20(9):e264. PubMed ID: 30249588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction.
    Dautenhahn K
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2007 Apr; 362(1480):679-704. PubMed ID: 17301026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AppraisalCloudPCT: A Computational Model of Emotions for Socially Interactive Robots for Autistic Rehabilitation.
    Yan T; Lin S; Wang J; Deng F; Jiang Z; Chen G; Su J; Zhang J
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2023; 2023():5960764. PubMed ID: 36926186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speculating About Robot Moral Standing: On the Constitution of Social Robots as Objects of Governance.
    De Pagter J
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():769349. PubMed ID: 34926591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social service robots to support independent living : Experiences from a field trial.
    Pripfl J; Körtner T; Batko-Klein D; Hebesberger D; Weninger M; Gisinger C
    Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2016 Jun; 49(4):282-7. PubMed ID: 27220733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
    Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.