123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36993440)
1. Dimensionality reduction methods for extracting functional networks from large-scale CRISPR screens.
Zernab Hassan A; Ward HN; Rahman M; Billmann M; Lee Y; Myers CL
bioRxiv; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36993440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensionality reduction methods for extracting functional networks from large-scale CRISPR screens.
Hassan AZ; Ward HN; Rahman M; Billmann M; Lee Y; Myers CL
Mol Syst Biol; 2023 Nov; 19(11):e11657. PubMed ID: 37750448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for benchmarking genetic screens reveals a predominant mitochondrial bias.
Rahman M; Billmann M; Costanzo M; Aregger M; Tong AHY; Chan K; Ward HN; Brown KR; Andrews BJ; Boone C; Moffat J; Myers CL
Mol Syst Biol; 2021 May; 17(5):e10013. PubMed ID: 34018332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characteristics and prognostic value of potential dependency genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on a large-scale CRISPR-Cas9 and RNAi screening database DepMap.
Shi B; Ding J; Qi J; Gu Z
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(9):2063-2075. PubMed ID: 33850477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined gene essentiality scoring improves the prediction of cancer dependency maps.
Wang W; Malyutina A; Pessia A; Saarela J; Heckman CA; Tang J
EBioMedicine; 2019 Dec; 50():67-80. PubMed ID: 31732481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unsupervised correction of gene-independent cell responses to CRISPR-Cas9 targeting.
Iorio F; Behan FM; Gonçalves E; Bhosle SG; Chen E; Shepherd R; Beaver C; Ansari R; Pooley R; Wilkinson P; Harper S; Butler AP; Stronach EA; Saez-Rodriguez J; Yusa K; Garnett MJ
BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):604. PubMed ID: 30103702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved estimation of cancer dependencies from large-scale RNAi screens using model-based normalization and data integration.
McFarland JM; Ho ZV; Kugener G; Dempster JM; Montgomery PG; Bryan JG; Krill-Burger JM; Green TM; Vazquez F; Boehm JS; Golub TR; Hahn WC; Root DE; Tsherniak A
Nat Commun; 2018 Nov; 9(1):4610. PubMed ID: 30389920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CoRe: a robustly benchmarked R package for identifying core-fitness genes in genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens.
Vinceti A; Karakoc E; Pacini C; Perron U; De Lucia RR; Garnett MJ; Iorio F
BMC Genomics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):828. PubMed ID: 34789150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extracting functional insights from loss-of-function screens using deep link prediction.
Strybol PP; Larmuseau M; de Schaetzen van Brienen L; Van den Bulcke T; Marchal K
Cell Rep Methods; 2022 Feb; 2(2):100171. PubMed ID: 35474966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inferring cancer dependencies on metabolic genes from large-scale genetic screens.
Lagziel S; Lee WD; Shlomi T
BMC Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 31039782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computational correction of copy number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells.
Meyers RM; Bryan JG; McFarland JM; Weir BA; Sizemore AE; Xu H; Dharia NV; Montgomery PG; Cowley GS; Pantel S; Goodale A; Lee Y; Ali LD; Jiang G; Lubonja R; Harrington WF; Strickland M; Wu T; Hawes DC; Zhivich VA; Wyatt MR; Kalani Z; Chang JJ; Okamoto M; Stegmaier K; Golub TR; Boehm JS; Vazquez F; Root DE; Hahn WC; Tsherniak A
Nat Genet; 2017 Dec; 49(12):1779-1784. PubMed ID: 29083409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal construction of a functional interaction network from pooled library CRISPR fitness screens.
Gheorghe V; Hart T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):510. PubMed ID: 36443674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An interactive web application for processing, correcting, and visualizing genome-wide pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens.
Vinceti A; De Lucia RR; Cremaschi P; Perron U; Karakoc E; Mauri L; Fernandez C; Kluczynski KH; Anderson DS; Iorio F
Cell Rep Methods; 2023 Jan; 3(1):100373. PubMed ID: 36814834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. iCSDB: an integrated database of CRISPR screens.
Choi A; Jang I; Han H; Kim MS; Choi J; Lee J; Cho SY; Jun Y; Lee C; Kim J; Lee B; Lee S
Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Jan; 49(D1):D956-D961. PubMed ID: 33137185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comprehensive clinically informed map of dependencies in cancer cells and framework for target prioritization.
Pacini C; Duncan E; Gonçalves E; Gilbert J; Bhosle S; Horswell S; Karakoc E; Lightfoot H; Curry E; Muyas F; Bouaboula M; Pedamallu CS; Cortes-Ciriano I; Behan FM; Zalmas LP; Barthorpe A; Francies H; Rowley S; Pollard J; Beltrao P; Parts L; Iorio F; Garnett MJ
Cancer Cell; 2024 Feb; 42(2):301-316.e9. PubMed ID: 38215750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimensionality Reduction and Louvain Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering for Cluster-Specified Frequent Biomarker Discovery in Single-Cell Sequencing Data.
Seth S; Mallik S; Bhadra T; Zhao Z
Front Genet; 2022; 13():828479. PubMed ID: 35198011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting Cancer Cell Line Dependencies From the Protein Expression Data of Reverse-Phase Protein Arrays.
Chen MM; Li J; Mills GB; Liang H
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2020 Apr; 4():357-366. PubMed ID: 32330068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sex-biased genome-editing effects of CRISPR-Cas9 across cancer cells dependent on p53 status.
Guo M; Xiong Y
iScience; 2023 Sep; 26(9):107529. PubMed ID: 37636042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unsupervised Learning Approach for Comparing Multiple Transposon Insertion Sequencing Studies.
Hubbard TP; D'Gama JD; Billings G; Davis BM; Waldor MK
mSphere; 2019 Feb; 4(1):. PubMed ID: 30787116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome-scale CRISPR screening at high sensitivity with an empirically designed sgRNA library.
Henkel L; Rauscher B; Schmitt B; Winter J; Boutros M
BMC Biol; 2020 Nov; 18(1):174. PubMed ID: 33228647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
