BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36994613)

  • 1. An in silico study on the detectability of field cancerization through parenchymal analysis of digital mammograms.
    Hernández A; Miranda DA; Pertuz S
    Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6379-6389. PubMed ID: 36994613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field cancerization in the understanding of parenchymal analysis of mammograms for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Miranda DA; Pertuz S
    Med Hypotheses; 2020 Mar; 136():109511. PubMed ID: 31837523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
    Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study.
    Kontos D; Bakic PR; Carton AK; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 19201357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.
    Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Hsieh MK; Pantalone L; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):977-984. PubMed ID: 29395798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.
    Kontos D; Ikejimba LC; Bakic PR; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 21771961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.
    Daye D; Keller B; Conant EF; Chen J; Schnall MD; Maidment AD; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2013 May; 20(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 23570938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
    Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
    Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Affecting Breast Cancer Detectability on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Two-Dimensional Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts.
    Lee SH; Jang MJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Rim J; Chang JM; Kim B; Choi HY
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30627022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using automated texture features to determine the probability for masking of a tumor on mammography, but not ultrasound.
    Häberle L; Hack CC; Heusinger K; Wagner F; Jud SM; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wittenberg T; Fasching PA
    Eur J Med Res; 2017 Aug; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 28854966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image retrieval-based parenchymal analysis for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Padilla A; Arponen O; Rinta-Kiikka I; Pertuz S
    Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 34837254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.
    Gastounioti A; Oustimov A; Keller BM; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):5862. PubMed ID: 27806604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of compressed breast thickness and dose on lesion detectability in digital mammography: FROC study with simulated lesions in real mammograms.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C; Van Steen A; Michielsen K; Cockmartin L; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5104. PubMed ID: 27587041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
    Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new near-term breast cancer risk prediction scheme based on the quantitative analysis of ipsilateral view mammograms.
    Sun W; Tseng TB; Qian W; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Yu H; Zhou S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():29-38. PubMed ID: 29512502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.