259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36995201)
1. Does posterior approach always lead to poor functional and cosmetic outcomes in displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures?
Koşucu T; Şimşek EK; Haberal B; Dincer R; Kovalak E; Baykal YB
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2023 Apr; 29(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 36995201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical results of closed versus mini-open reduction with percutaneous pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: A retrospective case-control study.
Tomori Y; Nanno M; Takai S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(45):e13162. PubMed ID: 30407346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Effectiveness of Closed Reduction With Percutaneous Pinning and Open Reduction With Internal Fixation in the Operative Management of Pediatric Type III Supracondylar Fractures.
Abousaleh MA; Zeidan AA; Mukhtar I; Keshta AS; Aladraj TH; Shaaban OA; Keshta MS; Alqasim R
Cureus; 2022 Feb; 14(2):e22707. PubMed ID: 35386149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adolescent Distal Humerus Fractures: ORIF Versus CRPP.
Bell P; Scannell BP; Loeffler BJ; Brighton BK; Gaston RG; Casey V; Peters ME; Frick S; Cannada L; Vanderhave KL
J Pediatr Orthop; 2017 Dec; 37(8):511-520. PubMed ID: 26683504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The posterior intrafocal pin improves sagittal alignment in Gartland type III paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.
Kao HK; Lee WC; Yang WE; Chang CH
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):842-7. PubMed ID: 26777466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of ultrasound in the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning in supracondylar humeral fractures.
Wu Y; Lu R; Liao S; Ding X; Su W; Wei Q
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 16(1):588. PubMed ID: 34641943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Type II Lateral Condyle Humerus Fractures in Children Displaced >2 mm.
Pennock AT; Salgueiro L; Upasani VV; Bastrom TP; Newton PO; Yaszay B
J Pediatr Orthop; 2016 Dec; 36(8):780-786. PubMed ID: 26090985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new joystick technique for unsuccessful closed reduction of supracondylar humeral fractures: minimum trauma.
Basaran SH; Ercin E; Bilgili MG; Bayrak A; Cumen H; Avkan MC
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Feb; 25(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 24950771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning vs open reduction and internal fixation in pediatric lateral condylar humerus fractures displaced by > 4 mm: an observational cross-sectional study.
Xie LW; Deng ZQ; Zhao RH; Wang J; Liu X; Zhou Y; Zhang H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(1):985. PubMed ID: 34823533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children.
Maity A; Saha D; Roy DS
J Orthop Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 7():6. PubMed ID: 22335830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation after a mean 22.4 years of follow-up.
Guven MF; Kaynak G; Inan M; Caliskan G; Unlu HB; Kesmezacar H
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Apr; 24(4):640-6. PubMed ID: 25648970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiographic and clinical assessment of supracondylar humeral fractures resulted from sports in children].
Liu ZJ; Pan SN; Zhang LJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 97(3):208-211. PubMed ID: 28162172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The prognostic value of the fracture level in the treatment of Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fracture in children.
Kang S; Kam M; Miraj F; Park SS
Bone Joint J; 2015 Jan; 97-B(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 25568427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Treatment of pediatric displaced supracondylar humerus fractures by fixation with two cross K-wires following reduction achieved after cutting the triceps muscle in a reverse V-shape].
Gürkan V; Orhun H; Akça O; Ercan T; Ozel S
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2008; 42(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 18716428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-surgeon perspective: is there ever a need to open extension-type supracondylar fractures?
Low LYH; Barry ME; Condell R; Clesham K; Devitt AT
Ir J Med Sci; 2023 Dec; 192(6):2845-2849. PubMed ID: 36849653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of ultrasound in the closed reduction and percutaneous pinning in supracondylar humeral fractures.
Rehm A; Ong JCY; Kobezda T; Ashby E
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Feb; 17(1):84. PubMed ID: 35148804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compared outcomes after percutaneous pinning versus open reduction in paediatric supracondylar elbow fractures.
Yaokreh JB; Gicquel P; Schneider L; Stanchina C; Karger C; Saliba E; Ossenou O; Clavert JM
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 98(6):645-51. PubMed ID: 22981702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double joystick technique - a modified method facilitates operation of Gartlend type-Ⅲ supracondylar humeral fractures in children.
Li G; Cheng X; Zhang J; Sun Y; Cao Z; Liu Y
J Pediatr Orthop B; 2024 Mar; 33(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 37102977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial-lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus.
Prashant K; Lakhotia D; Bhattacharyya TD; Mahanta AK; Ravoof A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Sep; 17(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 27312248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ipsilateral supracondylar fracture and forearm bone injury in children: a retrospective review of thirty one cases.
Dhoju D; Shrestha D; Parajuli N; Dhakal G; Shrestha R
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2011; 9(34):11-6. PubMed ID: 22610861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
