BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36995451)

  • 1. Impact of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography on the Therapeutic Decision of Prostate Carcinoma Primary Staging: A Retrospective Analysis at the Brazilian National Public Health System.
    da Silva ACB; de Toledo LGM; de Carvalho Fernandes R; Ziroldo AR; Sawczyn GV; Alarcon ST; Lewin F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4541-4549. PubMed ID: 36995451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.
    Donswijk ML; van Leeuwen PJ; Vegt E; Cheung Z; Heijmink SWTPJ; van der Poel HG; Stokkel MPM
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):723. PubMed ID: 32758168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
    Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
    Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
    Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Prospective Comparison of
    Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is there a nonnegligible effect of maximum standardized uptake value in the staging and management of prostate cancer with 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography imaging? A single-center experience.
    Ekmekcioglu O; Yavuzsan AH; Arican P; Kirecci SL
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(6):1351-1357. PubMed ID: 34916365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography in primary staging of prostate cancer.
    Koschel S; Murphy DG; Hofman MS; Wong LM
    Curr Opin Urol; 2019 Nov; 29(6):569-577. PubMed ID: 31567440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New Clinical Indications for (18)F/(11)C-choline, New Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography and a Promising Hybrid Device for Prostate Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Evangelista L; Briganti A; Fanti S; Joniau S; Reske S; Schiavina R; Stief C; Thalmann GN; Picchio M
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 26850970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison study of 68gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for locoregional staging of prostate cancer.
    Patel KS; Singh T; Raghuvanshi K; Sonar S; Chaudhari R
    Urol Sci; 2024 Mar; 35(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 38566885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How accurate is
    Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.
    Mattana F; Muraglia L; Rajwa P; Zattoni F; Marra G; Chiu PKF; Heidegger I; Kasivisvanathan V; Kesch CV; Olivier J; Preisser F; Thibault C; Valerio M; van den Bergh RCN; Gandaglia G; Ceci F;
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 6(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 36804735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Multicenter Prospective Clinical Trial of
    McCarthy M; Francis R; Tang C; Watts J; Campbell A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jul; 104(4):801-808. PubMed ID: 30890448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incremental Impact of [
    Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk of metastatic disease on
    Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samaratunga H; Yaxley WJ; Coughlin G; Yaxley AJ; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D
    BJU Int; 2019 Sep; 124(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 31141284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
    Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging.
    Ma TM; Gafita A; Shabsovich D; Juarez J; Grogan TR; Thin P; Armstrong W; Sonni I; Nguyen K; Lok V; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Steinberg ML; Kupelian PA; Yang DD; Muralidhar V; Chu C; Feng F; Savjani R; Deng J; Parikh NR; Nickols NG; Elashoff D; Czernin J; Calais J; Kishan AU
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):100-103. PubMed ID: 33602654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary lymph-node staging with
    Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
    Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.