178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36995451)
21. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer.
Xiang M; Ma TM; Savjani R; Pollom EL; Karnes RJ; Grogan T; Wong JK; Motterle G; Tosoian JJ; Trock BJ; Klein EA; Stish BJ; Dess RT; Spratt DE; Pilar A; Reddy C; Levin-Epstein R; Wedde TB; Lilleby WA; Fiano R; Merrick GS; Stock RG; Demanes DJ; Moran BJ; Huland H; Tran PT; Martin S; Martinez-Monge R; Krauss DJ; Abu-Isa EI; Alam R; Schwen Z; Pisansky TM; Choo CR; Song DY; Greco S; Deville C; McNutt T; DeWeese TL; Ross AE; Ciezki JP; Boutros PC; Nickols NG; Bhat P; Shabsovich D; Juarez JE; Chong N; Kupelian PA; Rettig MB; Zaorsky NG; Berlin A; Tward JD; Davis BJ; Reiter RE; Steinberg ML; Elashoff D; Horwitz EM; Tendulkar RD; Tilki D; Czernin J; Gafita A; Romero T; Calais J; Kishan AU
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2138550. PubMed ID: 34902034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial.
de Feria Cardet RE; Hofman MS; Segard T; Yim J; Williams S; Francis RJ; Frydenberg M; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG; De Abreu Lourenco R
Eur Urol; 2021 Mar; 79(3):413-418. PubMed ID: 33341285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.
Amin A; Blazevski A; Thompson J; Scheltema MJ; Hofman MS; Murphy D; Lawrentschuk N; Sathianathen N; Kapoor J; Woo HH; Chalasani V; Rasiah K; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Cusick T; Stricker P; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [
Hirmas N; Al-Ibraheem A; Herrmann K; Alsharif A; Muhsin H; Khader J; Al-Daghmin A; Salah S
Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Jun; 21(3):574-581. PubMed ID: 30215174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.
Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Francis RJ; Tang C; Vela I; Thomas P; Rutherford N; Martin JM; Frydenberg M; Shakher R; Wong LM; Taubman K; Ting Lee S; Hsiao E; Roach P; Nottage M; Kirkwood I; Hayne D; Link E; Marusic P; Matera A; Herschtal A; Iravani A; Hicks RJ; Williams S; Murphy DG;
Lancet; 2020 Apr; 395(10231):1208-1216. PubMed ID: 32209449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer.
van Leeuwen PJ; Emmett L; Ho B; Delprado W; Ting F; Nguyen Q; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 27207581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Primary Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Abrams-Pompe RS; Fanti S; Schoots IG; Moore CM; Turkbey B; Vickers AJ; Walz J; Steuber T; Eastham JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Jun; 4(3):370-395. PubMed ID: 33272865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Is Associated with Improved Oncological Outcome in Men Treated with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Meijer D; Eppinga WSC; Mohede RM; Vanneste BGL; Meijnen P; Meijer OWM; Daniels LA; van den Bergh RCN; Lont AP; Ettema RH; Oudshoorn FHK; van Leeuwen PJ; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Oprea-Lager DE; Schaake EE; Vis AN
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 35074282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lymph node staging with 68Ga-PSMA PET in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer suitable for radical prostatectomy managed in a prostate cancer unit.
Maestroni UV; Campobasso D; Guarino G; Acampora A; Scarlattei M; Ziglioli F; Dinale F; Baldari G; Migliari S; Gasparro D; Ferretti S; Silini EM; Ruffini L
Chin Clin Oncol; 2023 Jun; 12(3):22. PubMed ID: 37417288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. ASO Author Reflections: PSMA PET in the Prostate Cancer Primary Staging Scenario-A Reliable Method with a Remarkable Decision-Making Impact.
da Silva ACB; de Toledo LGM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4550-4551. PubMed ID: 37010662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography for staging prostate cancer.
Ravi Kumar AS; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Sep; 30(5):628-634. PubMed ID: 32701720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study.
Domachevsky L; Bernstine H; Goldberg N; Nidam M; Catalano OA; Groshar D
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):328-336. PubMed ID: 31332559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
Esen T; Falay O; Tarim K; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Kilic M; Seymen H; Sarikaya AF; Kiremit MC; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Baydar DE; Kordan Y; Demirkol MO; Tilki D
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):288-293. PubMed ID: 33509671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A prospective, multicenter head-to-head comparative study in patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer investigating the bone lesion detection of conventional imaging and
Bodar YJL; Luining WI; Keizer B; Meijer D; Vellekoop A; Schaaf M; Hendrikse NH; Van Moorselaar RJA; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 41(4):205.e17-205.e24. PubMed ID: 36588019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Five-year trends of bone scan and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography utilization in prostate cancer: A retrospective review in a private centre.
Haran C; McBean R; Parsons R; Wong D
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 63(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 30972933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Cantiello F; Gangemi V; Cascini GL; Calabria F; Moschini M; Ferro M; Musi G; Butticè S; Salonia A; Briganti A; Damiano R
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():139-145. PubMed ID: 28438628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Potential Impact of
Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of
Ferraro DA; Garcia Schüler HI; Muehlematter UJ; Eberli D; Müller J; Müller A; Gablinger R; Kranzbühler H; Omlin A; Kaufmann PA; Hermanns T; Burger IA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Mar; 47(3):652-664. PubMed ID: 31802175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
