These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36995512)

  • 1. Comparison of 2D and autostereoscopic 3D visualization during mixed reality simulation.
    Vörös V; De Smet J; Ourak M; Poliakov V; Deprest J; Kimpe T; Vander Poorten E
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Sep; 18(9):1679-1686. PubMed ID: 36995512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autostereoscopic 3D Augmented Reality Navigation for Laparoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Assessment.
    Zhang X; Otoo EM; Fan Y; Tao C; Wang T; Rhode K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 70(4):1413-1421. PubMed ID: 36301782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D.
    Wilhelm D; Reiser S; Kohn N; Witte M; Leiner U; Mühlbach L; Ruschin D; Reiner W; Feussner H
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2387-97. PubMed ID: 24651895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
    Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Augmented reality-based autostereoscopic surgical visualization system for telesurgery.
    Huang T; Li R; Li Y; Zhang X; Liao H
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Nov; 16(11):1985-1997. PubMed ID: 34363583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3D vision.
    Hagelsteen K; Langegård A; Lantz A; Ekelund M; Anderberg M; Bergenfelz A
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Oct; 26(5):269-277. PubMed ID: 28367667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Force and Psychomotor Skills in a Novel Virtual Reality-Based Haptic Simulator.
    Prasad MS; Manivannan M; Manoharan G; Chandramohan SM
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(5):858-69. PubMed ID: 27267563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopy training of novices with complex curved instruments using 2D- and 3D-visualization.
    Hidding J; Bucher J; Heiliger C; Andrade D; Trupka L; Halmen M; Werner J; Karcz K; Frank A
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Apr; 409(1):109. PubMed ID: 38570339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing the Learning Curve in Novice Laparoscopists: Incorporating Direct Visualization into the Simulation Training Program.
    Dawidek MT; Roach VA; Ott MC; Wilson TD
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 27717706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D vs. 4K Display System - Influence of "State-of-the-art"-Display Technique On Surgical Performance (IDOSP-Study) in minimally invasive surgery: protocol for a randomized cross-over trial.
    Wahba R; Datta RR; Hedergott A; Bußhoff J; Bruns T; Kleinert R; Dieplinger G; Fuchs H; Gietzelt C; Möller D; Hellmich M; Bruns CJ; Stippel DL
    Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):299. PubMed ID: 31138290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
    Wang Z; Liang J; Chen J; Mei S; Liu Q
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2883-2887. PubMed ID: 33112544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparisons of orthodontic residents' performance and attitudes using 2D, 3D, and virtual reality surgical simulation methods.
    Sytek L; Inglehart MR; Ramaswamy V; Aronovich S; Edwards S; Kim-Berman H
    J Dent Educ; 2021 Aug; 85(8):1415-1426. PubMed ID: 33792038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can 3D Vision Improve Laparoscopic Performance in Box Simulation Training when Compared to Conventional 2D Vision?
    Österberg J; Sokratous A; Georgiou K; Enochsson L
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2019 Dec; 61(4):491-499. PubMed ID: 32337864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An autostereoscopic 3D display can improve visualization of 3D models from intracranial MR angiography.
    Abildgaard A; Witwit AK; Karlsen JS; Jacobsen EA; Tennøe B; Ringstad G; Due-Tønnessen P
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Sep; 5(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 20652646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective Cohort Study of Haptic Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Learning Curve Trajectory.
    Brown C; Robinson D; Egan R; Hopkins L; Abdelrahman T; Powell A; Pollitt MJ; Lewis WG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Sep; 29(9):1128-1134. PubMed ID: 31361560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
    Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
    Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
    Currò G; La Malfa G; Caizzone A; Rampulla V; Navarra G
    Obes Surg; 2015 Nov; 25(11):2120-4. PubMed ID: 25893652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
    Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
    World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of a 3D head-mounted display (HMS-3000MT) and 3D passive polarizing display with 2D technique for first laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by novice surgeons.
    Hanani M; Cernat V; Beyer K; Walschus U; Schulze T; Heidecke CD; Patrzyk M
    Hernia; 2020 Jun; 24(3):661-668. PubMed ID: 31745653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distraction and proficiency in laparoscopy: 2D versus robotic console 3D immersion.
    Kim S; May A; Ryan H; Mohsin A; Tsuda S
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Nov; 31(11):4625-4630. PubMed ID: 28409364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.