199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 36996212)
21. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Genomic prediction of growth in pigs based on a model including additive and dominance effects.
Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 26676611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.
Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Vitezica ZG; Reverter A
J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4028-4034. PubMed ID: 30032181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
Su G; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Henryon M; Lund MS
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45293. PubMed ID: 23028912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fast kernel-based association testing of non-linear genetic effects for biobank-scale data.
Fu B; Pazokitoroudi A; Sudarshan M; Liu Z; Subramanian L; Sankararaman S
Nat Commun; 2023 Aug; 14(1):4936. PubMed ID: 37582955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantification of frequency-dependent genetic architectures in 25 UK Biobank traits reveals action of negative selection.
Schoech AP; Jordan DM; Loh PR; Gazal S; O'Connor LJ; Balick DJ; Palamara PF; Finucane HK; Sunyaev SR; Price AL
Nat Commun; 2019 Feb; 10(1):790. PubMed ID: 30770844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of common genetic variation and rare CNVs in the Australian Autism Biobank.
Yap CX; Alvares GA; Henders AK; Lin T; Wallace L; Farrelly A; McLaren T; Berry J; Vinkhuyzen AAE; Trzaskowski M; Zeng J; Yang Y; Cleary D; Grove R; Hafekost C; Harun A; Holdsworth H; Jellett R; Khan F; Lawson L; Leslie J; Levis Frenk M; Masi A; Mathew NE; Muniandy M; Nothard M; Visscher PM; Dawson PA; Dissanayake C; Eapen V; Heussler HS; Whitehouse AJO; Wray NR; Gratten J
Mol Autism; 2021 Feb; 12(1):12. PubMed ID: 33568206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing empirical kinship derived heritability for imaging genetics traits in the UK biobank and human connectome project.
Gao S; Donohue B; Hatch KS; Chen S; Ma T; Ma Y; Kvarta MD; Bruce H; Adhikari BM; Jahanshad N; Thompson PM; Blangero J; Hong LE; Medland SE; Ganjgahi H; Nichols TE; Kochunov P
Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118700. PubMed ID: 34740793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Novel use of derived genotype probabilities to discover significant dominance effects for milk production traits in dairy cattle.
Boysen TJ; Heuer C; Tetens J; Reinhardt F; Thaller G
Genetics; 2013 Feb; 193(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 23222654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A genome-wide association study reveals additive and dominance effects on growth and fatness traits in large white pigs.
Yang W; Wu J; Yu J; Zheng X; Kang H; Wang Z; Zhang S; Zhou L; Liu J
Anim Genet; 2021 Oct; 52(5):749-753. PubMed ID: 34403536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multi-environment analysis of sorghum breeding trials using additive and dominance genomic relationships.
Hunt CH; Hayes BJ; van Eeuwijk FA; Mace ES; Jordan DR
Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Mar; 133(3):1009-1018. PubMed ID: 31907563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detecting the dominance component of heritability in isolated and outbred human populations.
Herzig AF; Nutile T; Ruggiero D; Ciullo M; Perdry H; Leutenegger AL
Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):18048. PubMed ID: 30575761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Controlling for background genetic effects using polygenic scores improves the power of genome-wide association studies.
Bennett D; O'Shea D; Ferguson J; Morris D; Seoighe C
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19571. PubMed ID: 34599249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Relationships between estimated autozygosity and complex traits in the UK Biobank.
Johnson EC; Evans LM; Keller MC
PLoS Genet; 2018 Jul; 14(7):e1007556. PubMed ID: 30052639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sibling variation in polygenic traits and DNA recombination mapping with UK Biobank and IVF family data.
Lello L; Hsu M; Widen E; Raben TG
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):376. PubMed ID: 36611071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Novel genetic variants associated with brain functional networks in 18,445 adults from the UK Biobank.
Foo H; Thalamuthu A; Jiang J; Koch FC; Mather KA; Wen W; Sachdev PS
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14633. PubMed ID: 34272439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genome-wide association study of multisite chronic pain in UK Biobank.
Johnston KJA; Adams MJ; Nicholl BI; Ward J; Strawbridge RJ; Ferguson A; McIntosh AM; Bailey MES; Smith DJ
PLoS Genet; 2019 Jun; 15(6):e1008164. PubMed ID: 31194737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Bayesian neural networks with variable selection for prediction of genotypic values.
van Bergen GHH; Duenk P; Albers CA; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Kappen HJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 May; 52(1):26. PubMed ID: 32414320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
